aiqbench analysis
This research advances reinforcement learning techniques by addressing the specific challenge of learning optimal inventory policies from censored demand data, where stockouts obscure true customer needs. By introducing a novel cost decomposition and biased sample-average approximation algorithms, the authors establish conditions for efficient policy learning that balance pessimism and optimism under limited feedback. The work offers significant theoretical value for applying machine learning to sequential decision-making problems in supply chain management where full observability is impossible.
Towards Optimal Inventory Control under Censored Demand: A Biased Sample-Average Approximation Approach
arXiv:2609.39397v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We study data-driven multi-period lost-sales inventory control under censored demand, where a stockout reveals only that demand exceeded the stocking level. We develop a unified, model-based framework for policy learning from censored data, built on a new cost decomposition for base-stock policies and a biased sample-average approximation (SAA) approach. The cost decomposition allows us to propose a new coverage condition under which censored observations are informative enough for sample-efficient policy learning. Guided by this coverage condition, we design two biased SAA algorithms: an upper-biased one that achieves near-optimal sample complexity under the offline coverage condition, and a lower-biased one that actively generates the required coverage and achieves near-optimal regret online. More broadly, this biased SAA approach provides a general principle for implementing pessimism and optimism under censored feedback, which may be of independent interest.
Abstract:We study data-driven multi-period lost-sales inventory control under censored demand, where a stockout reveals only that demand exceeded the stocking level. We develop a unified, model-based framework for policy learning from censored data, built on a new cost decomposition for base-stock policies and a biased sample-average approximation (SAA) approach. The cost decomposition allows us to propose a new coverage condition under which censored observations are informative enough for sample-efficient policy learning. Guided by this coverage condition, we design two biased SAA algorithms: an upper-biased one that achieves near-optimal sample complexity under the offline coverage condition, and a lower-biased one that actively generates the required coverage and achieves near-optimal regret online. More broadly, this biased SAA approach provides a general principle for implementing pessimism and optimism under censored feedback, which may be of independent interest.
Machine Learning (stat.ML); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2609.39397 [stat.ML]
(or arXiv:2609.39397v1 [stat.ML] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.39397 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 231 words
Related coverage

Stock Market Today Highlights, Sept 2: Sensex ends 373 pts lower at 76, 570, Nifty below 24, 000; Asian Paints, HDFC Bank fall most
thehindubusinessline.com · Sep 2, 2026
Against Export Controls (and China Threat Models)
LessWrong · Sep 24, 2026

Digital States 2026: AI Moves From Experiment to Infrastructure
govtech.com · Sep 24, 2026

AI Readiness: The DOs and DON'Ts That Determine Success
AppDirect · May 26, 2026