aiqbench analysis
This paper presents the first rigorous regret analysis for ReMax, an algorithm originally designed for reinforcement learning contexts involving multiple attempts per arm. The study establishes finite-time bounds for Gaussian bandits and demonstrates that while increasing the number of virtual draws ($M$) mitigates specific underestimation errors, it does not guarantee a reduction in total regret compared to standard methods like Thompson sampling. These findings clarify the theoretical trade-offs inherent in retry-based objectives such as pass@k, offering crucial insights for optimizing exploration strategies in sequential decision-making systems.
Regret Analysis of Retry-Based Bandits
arXiv:2605.20854v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We provide the first regret analysis of ReMax in stochastic multi-armed bandits. Originally introduced for reinforcement learning, ReMax is motivated by the role of exploration when multiple attempts are allowed, and is closely related to retry-based objectives such as pass@$k$ and max@$k$, which value the best outcome across those attempts. Given a posterior over arm values, ReMax chooses a sampling distribution that maximizes the posterior expected maximum arm value over $M$ virtual draws. For Gaussian rewards with $K$ arms and any fixed integer $M\ge2$, we characterize optimal sampling distributions through an expected-improvement balance condition and prove an $O(\sqrt{(M-1)KT\log T})$ finite-time bound on expected regret. Our analysis separates a logarithmic contribution from rounds without optimal-arm underestimation and a recovery term that dominates the bound. For every fixed instance with pairwise distinct arm means, we further prove an asymptotic logarithmic regret upper bound whose coefficient is at most $M-1$ times the optimal coefficient by Lai and Robbins. When $M=2$, this bound implies the asymptotic optimality of ReMax. Gaussian-bandit experiments show that ReMax performs competitively with Thompson sampling and KL-UCB. They also reveal a trade-off: larger $M$ reduces regret incurred during optimal-arm underestimation, but this reduction does not necessarily translate into lower total regret. Controlled recovery experiments show that separating suboptimal means accelerates recovery, while severe underestimation of the optimal arm can lead to long delays before it is sampled again.
Abstract:We provide the first regret analysis of ReMax in stochastic multi-armed bandits. Originally introduced for reinforcement learning, ReMax is motivated by the role of exploration when multiple attempts are allowed, and is closely related to retry-based objectives such as pass@$k$ and max@$k$, which value the best outcome across those attempts. Given a posterior over arm values, ReMax chooses a sampling distribution that maximizes the posterior expected maximum arm value over $M$ virtual draws. For Gaussian rewards with $K$ arms and any fixed integer $M\ge2$, we characterize optimal sampling distributions through an expected-improvement balance condition and prove an $O(\sqrt{(M-1)KT\log T})$ finite-time bound on expected regret. Our analysis separates a logarithmic contribution from rounds without optimal-arm underestimation and a recovery term that dominates the bound. For every fixed instance with pairwise distinct arm means, we further prove an asymptotic logarithmic regret upper bound whose coefficient is at most $M-1$ times the optimal coefficient by Lai and Robbins. When $M=2$, this bound implies the asymptotic optimality of ReMax. Gaussian-bandit experiments show that ReMax performs competitively with Thompson sampling and KL-UCB. They also reveal a trade-off: larger $M$ reduces regret incurred during optimal-arm underestimation, but this reduction does not necessarily translate into lower total regret. Controlled recovery experiments show that separating suboptimal means accelerates recovery, while severe underestimation of the optimal arm can lead to long delays before it is sampled again.
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2605.20854 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2605.20854v3 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.20854 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 320 words
Related coverage
Bandit Submodular Maximization under Matroid Constraints: Learning Compressed Exchange Policy
arXiv · Aug 26, 2026
A Unified Optimism-Agnostic Framework for Linear Bandits over Spherical Action Sets
arXiv · Sep 30, 2026
Generalized Linear Bandits with Memory
arXiv · Aug 19, 2026
Gaussian-Width Bounds for Offline-to-Online Linear Bandits
arXiv · Oct 12, 2026