Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This paper advances the theoretical foundations of online learning by leveraging offline data in stochastic linear bandits, specifically addressing regimes with partial feature coverage. By tightening regret bounds through concentration inequalities for Gaussian vectors, it establishes new performance guarantees that outperform existing phased elimination methods. The work provides a rigorous mathematical framework for improving sample efficiency when transitioning from static datasets to dynamic decision-making environments.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Gaussian-Width Bounds for Offline-to-Online Linear Bandits

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2610.12990v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We study how offline data can help online learning in stochastic linear bandits. We focus on partially covered offline data, where only $k$ of the $d$ feature directions are poorly covered. Existing analyses of algorithms based on phased elimination and optimism give regret bounds of order $\widetilde O(\sqrt{dkT})$ in this regime. We show that this dependence arises from loose control of the reward prediction error, and obtain tighter bounds using concentration of Lipschitz functions of Gaussian vectors. Based on this analysis, we develop a phased elimination algorithm with regret $\widetilde O(k\sqrt T)$. For the unit Euclidean ball, we prove a matching regret lower bound under partial coverage, as well as matching upper and lower bounds under uniform offline coverage. We also study pure exploration with offline data, providing algorithms and matching upper and lower bounds on simple regret for fixed-design algorithms and also for adaptive algorithms under partial and uniform coverage of offline data.

Abstract:We study how offline data can help online learning in stochastic linear bandits. We focus on partially covered offline data, where only $k$ of the $d$ feature directions are poorly covered. Existing analyses of algorithms based on phased elimination and optimism give regret bounds of order $\widetilde O(\sqrt{dkT})$ in this regime. We show that this dependence arises from loose control of the reward prediction error, and obtain tighter bounds using concentration of Lipschitz functions of Gaussian vectors. Based on this analysis, we develop a phased elimination algorithm with regret $\widetilde O(k\sqrt T)$. For the unit Euclidean ball, we prove a matching regret lower bound under partial coverage, as well as matching upper and lower bounds under uniform offline coverage. We also study pure exploration with offline data, providing algorithms and matching upper and lower bounds on simple regret for fixed-design algorithms and also for adaptive algorithms under partial and uniform coverage of offline data.

Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2610.12990 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2610.12990v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.12990 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 248 words

Related coverage