aiqbench analysis
This paper introduces Reachability-Induced Optimization (RIO), a framework that rigorously defines the boundaries of what AI systems can actually optimize, distinguishing between approximate local solutions and true global optima. By proving formal results on reachability and control reliability, it establishes new standards for reporting optimization quality in complex tasks like tool-use and reasoning. The work provides essential benchmarks and validation scripts to help researchers verify whether claimed optimizations are genuinely global or merely artifacts of restricted search spaces.
Reachable Global Optimization in AI Systems: How Global Is Global?
arXiv:2609.27855v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: AI systems increasingly claim to optimize prompts, policies, architectures, plans, tool-use trajectories, reasoning traces, and test-time computation. This paper argues that such claims are underspecified unless they state the region actually reachable by the system that performed the optimization. We introduce Reachability-Induced Optimization (RIO), a model in which a generator, verifier, controller, memory, tools, and budget induce a reachable candidate region. The returned solution is therefore a best visited point, an approximate reachable optimum, or an exact global optimum only when additional certificates relate the reachable region to the full formal space. We prove reachable-optimality, false-globality, gap- decomposition, certificate, escape, pruning, and control-value results. The full benchmark record contains 66,150 executed trials over six known-optimum landscape families, seven control policies, 270 landscapes, and 35 runs per landscape-method. The online appendix includes raw trial records, aggregate tables, figures, benchmark code, validation scripts, and checksums. The results show that control can restrict, expand, or misdirect reachability, and that optimization quality, reachability quality, and control reliability must be reported separately.
Title:Reachable Global Optimization in AI Systems: How Global Is Global?
Abstract:AI systems increasingly claim to optimize prompts, policies, architectures, plans, tool-use trajectories, reasoning traces, and test-time computation. This paper argues that such claims are underspecified unless they state the region actually reachable by the system that performed the optimization. We introduce Reachability-Induced Optimization (RIO), a model in which a generator, verifier, controller, memory, tools, and budget induce a reachable candidate region. The returned solution is therefore a best visited point, an approximate reachable optimum, or an exact global optimum only when additional certificates relate the reachable region to the full formal space. We prove reachable-optimality, false-globality, gap- decomposition, certificate, escape, pruning, and control-value results. The full benchmark record contains 66,150 executed trials over six known-optimum landscape families, seven control policies, 270 landscapes, and 35 runs per landscape-method. The online appendix includes raw trial records, aggregate tables, figures, benchmark code, validation scripts, and checksums. The results show that control can restrict, expand, or misdirect reachability, and that optimization quality, reachability quality, and control reliability must be reported separately.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2609.27855 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2609.27855v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.27855 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 271 words
Related coverage

Import AI 473: The US’s superintelligence strategy; human brain in a mouse skull; and machine hermeneutics
Import AI · Sep 21, 2026

The Alignment Problem: Computer Science Meets Analytic Philosophy
AI Alignment Forum · Oct 18, 2026
A Learning Method with Gap-Aware Generation for Heterogeneous DAG Scheduling
arXiv · Jun 16, 2026
Fast Constraint Extraction for Corrective Control under STL Specifications via Logical Dependency Tracking
arXiv · Sep 10, 2026