Skip to content
aiqbench takeQuantum Computing

aiqbench analysis

This research investigates the generation of "quantum magic" (nonstabilizerness) within high-energy QED and electroweak processes, specifically analyzing how basis choices like laboratory versus helicity frames affect computational resource estimates. By comparing circuit realizations for Bhabha scattering amplitudes, the study reveals that while relativistic limits favor lower magic production in certain bases, fundamental constants naturally minimize this quantum advantage regardless of the reference frame selected. These findings offer critical insights into the theoretical constraints and basis-dependent complexities inherent when modeling high-energy physics on future fault-tolerant quantum computers.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Quantum Magic in High Energy Collision

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2608.19095v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Quantum magic, or nonstabilizerness, is a quantum resource associated with computational advantage in quantum systems. In high energy collisions, Quantum Electrodynamics (QED) is inefficient at generating magic while the weak mixing angle, a fundamental constant of nature, sits near a value that minimizes magic production in charged-lepton scattering. These observations were made in the laboratory (lab) basis, in which spin is projected along the incoming beam axis. An alternative choice is the helicity basis, in which spin is projected along the direction of motion of each particle. The transformation between these two bases is, in general, not a Clifford operation and therefore can change the amount of magic. We present a detailed study of magic production in both bases for QED and electroweak processes, and compare these results with the basis-invariant non-local magic. In the ultra-relativistic limit, magic production is generally smaller in the helicity basis due to helicity selection rules, while the lab basis generally yields less magic in the non-relativistic regime. We provide circuit realizations of the ultra-relativistic Bhabha amplitudes using linear combinations of unitaries and show that the lab basis construction contains a larger $T$-gate count at generic scattering angles. Interestingly, in both bases the physical weak mixing angle lies close to the value that minimizes magic production.

Abstract:Quantum magic, or nonstabilizerness, is a quantum resource associated with computational advantage in quantum systems. In high energy collisions, Quantum Electrodynamics (QED) is inefficient at generating magic while the weak mixing angle, a fundamental constant of nature, sits near a value that minimizes magic production in charged-lepton scattering. These observations were made in the laboratory (lab) basis, in which spin is projected along the incoming beam axis. An alternative choice is the helicity basis, in which spin is projected along the direction of motion of each particle. The transformation between these two bases is, in general, not a Clifford operation and therefore can change the amount of magic. We present a detailed study of magic production in both bases for QED and electroweak processes, and compare these results with the basis-invariant non-local magic. In the ultra-relativistic limit, magic production is generally smaller in the helicity basis due to helicity selection rules, while the lab basis generally yields less magic in the non-relativistic regime. We provide circuit realizations of the ultra-relativistic Bhabha amplitudes using linear combinations of unitaries and show that the lab basis construction contains a larger $T$-gate count at generic scattering angles. Interestingly, in both bases the physical weak mixing angle lies close to the value that minimizes magic production.

arXiv:2608.19095 [hep-ph]

(or arXiv:2608.19095v1 [hep-ph] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.19095 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 302 words

Related coverage