aiqbench analysis
This paper provides a rigorous dynamical explanation for the edge-of-stability phenomenon in Adam, isolating optimizer-induced dynamics from loss geometry variations. By proving a restoring tendency toward a specific stability threshold on a one-dimensional quadratic, it clarifies both the mechanisms driving this behavior and the conditions under which it fails. These findings offer critical theoretical insights for optimizing deep learning algorithms where standard optimizers exhibit instability near convergence.
Provable Edge-of-Stability for Adam on a One-Dimensional Quadratic
arXiv:2608.20638v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The edge-of-stability (EoS) phenomenon of Adam has been widely observed, while its underlying dynamical mechanism is not yet fully understood. We study uncorrected Adam on a one-dimensional quadratic, a clean setting where constant curvature isolates the optimizer-induced dynamics behind the EoS. We characterize the resulting dynamics across the parameter space. In broad regimes, we prove that Adam exhibits a restoring tendency toward its frozen stability threshold $2(1+\beta_1)/[\eta(1-\beta_1)]$. We also identify settings in which this edge-seeking mechanism breaks down, including strictly subcritical periodic orbits and specially tuned trajectories that converge to the optimum while remaining uniformly supercritical. These results give a concrete dynamical explanation for Adam's EoS in a setting free of evolving loss geometry, while also exposing its limitations.
Abstract:The edge-of-stability (EoS) phenomenon of Adam has been widely observed, while its underlying dynamical mechanism is not yet fully understood. We study uncorrected Adam on a one-dimensional quadratic, a clean setting where constant curvature isolates the optimizer-induced dynamics behind the EoS. We characterize the resulting dynamics across the parameter space. In broad regimes, we prove that Adam exhibits a restoring tendency toward its frozen stability threshold $2(1+\beta_1)/[\eta(1-\beta_1)]$. We also identify settings in which this edge-seeking mechanism breaks down, including strictly subcritical periodic orbits and specially tuned trajectories that converge to the optimum while remaining uniformly supercritical. These results give a concrete dynamical explanation for Adam's EoS in a setting free of evolving loss geometry, while also exposing its limitations.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Optimization and Control (math.OC)
arXiv:2608.20638 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2608.20638v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.20638 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 220 words
Related coverage

A brief history of quantum vs classical computational advantage
Quantum Journal · Sep 1, 2026
Non-Euclidean Gradient Descent Has Many Edges of Stability
arXiv · Oct 14, 2026

Order Parameter Discovery for Quantum Many-Body Systems
Quantum Journal · Sep 29, 2026
Beyond Quadratic Loss: The Stability Phase Diagram of Adam
arXiv · Sep 17, 2026