aiqbench analysis
This paper is theoretical optimization, but its motivation is training dynamics in deep learning (the "edge of stability" phenomenon), and it is cross-listed to cs.LG. It shows that the classic stability threshold for gradient descent on quadratics does not carry over cleanly to non-Euclidean norms: only Hilbertian norms give a sharp threshold, while other norms can produce many distinct stability edges. For ML readers, the result matters mainly as a warning that step-size and convergence intuitions from Euclidean gradient descent may not transfer to optimizers that use other geometries. The results are proven for quadratic objectives and two-dimensional constructions, so their direct bearing on large-scale training is still open.
Non-Euclidean Gradient Descent Has Many Edges of Stability
arXiv:2610.15223v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recent observations that deep learning models train at the edge of stability have renewed interest in understanding stability properties of classical optimization algorithms. For quadratic objectives, standard gradient descent has a sharp stability threshold: it converges from every initialization when $\eta2/L$, and diverges from every nonzero initialization when $\eta>2/\mu$. For non-Euclidean gradient descent, the corresponding known guarantees are weaker: convergence holds for every initialization when $\eta2/\mu$. The behavior in the intermediate regime $2/S<\eta<2/\mu$ is not fully characterized. We show that Hilbertian norms are the only ones for which $2/S$ is an almost-everywhere sharp threshold for every positive-definite quadratic objective. Using linear conjugacy between non-Euclidean and Euclidean gradient descent, we show that for general norms the intermediate regime can contain arbitrarily many edges of stability associated with distinct attracting directions. We identify a forward-invariant region of exponentially divergent directions beyond the generalized stability threshold. When the directions of minimum curvature are finite and nondegenerate, we prove that, sufficiently close to $2/\mu$ from below, only their invariant directions remain convergent. We give smooth two-dimensional constructions with arbitrarily many distinct thresholds, arbitrarily large relative threshold separation and show these properties to be stable.
Abstract:Recent observations that deep learning models train at the edge of stability have renewed interest in understanding stability properties of classical optimization algorithms. For quadratic objectives, standard gradient descent has a sharp stability threshold: it converges from every initialization when $\eta<2/L$, diverges from almost every initialization when $\eta>2/L$, and diverges from every nonzero initialization when $\eta>2/\mu$. For non-Euclidean gradient descent, the corresponding known guarantees are weaker: convergence holds for every initialization when $\eta<2/S$, where $S$ is the generalized sharpness, while every nonzero initialization diverges when $\eta>2/\mu$. The behavior in the intermediate regime $2/S<\eta<2/\mu$ is not fully characterized. We show that Hilbertian norms are the only ones for which $2/S$ is an almost-everywhere sharp threshold for every positive-definite quadratic objective. Using linear conjugacy between non-Euclidean and Euclidean gradient descent, we show that for general norms the intermediate regime can contain arbitrarily many edges of stability associated with distinct attracting directions. We identify a forward-invariant region of exponentially divergent directions beyond the generalized stability threshold. When the directions of minimum curvature are finite and nondegenerate, we prove that, sufficiently close to $2/\mu$ from below, only their invariant directions remain convergent. We give smooth two-dimensional constructions with arbitrarily many distinct thresholds, arbitrarily large relative threshold separation and show these properties to be stable.
Optimization and Control (math.OC); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2610.15223 [math.OC]
(or arXiv:2610.15223v1 [math.OC] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.15223 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 308 words
Related coverage
The Road Taken: The Role of Optimizers at the Edge of Stability
arXiv · Aug 20, 2026
Edge Flow: A Tractable and Predictive Continuous-Time Model for Gradient Descent at the Edge of Stability
arXiv · Jun 17, 2026
I trained GPT-2 with full-batch gradient descent so you don't have to
LessWrong · Oct 14, 2026
The Multiple Timescales of Gradient Descent on the Edge of Stability: A Perturbative Derivation of the Central Flow
arXiv · Sep 2, 2026