aiqbench analysis
This paper provides a formal perturbative derivation of the "central flow" model, treating gradient descent at the edge of stability as a singularly perturbed dynamical system. By applying the method of multiple scales, it rigorously identifies three distinct timescales—fast oscillations, intermediate self-stabilization, and slow drift along minimizers—to explain how fluctuations persist in deep learning optimization. The work bridges the gap between heuristic empirical models and theoretical analysis, offering deeper insight into the stability mechanisms governing modern neural network training dynamics.
The Multiple Timescales of Gradient Descent on the Edge of Stability: A Perturbative Derivation of the Central Flow
arXiv:2609.01034v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The central flow of Cohen et al. (2025) is an empirically accurate continuous-time model of gradient descent at the edge of stability in deep learning, However, its derivation is heuristic. We propose a perturbative regime in which the central flow is the limit of gradient descent: we assume that the loss decomposes as $f = g + \varepsilon h$; in the limit $\varepsilon \to 0$, the dynamics of gradient descent with learning rate $\eta$ converge to the gradient flow of $h$ constrained to the minimizers of $g$ of sharpness at most $2/\eta$. Our approach is formal rather than rigorous; it treats gradient descent as a singularly perturbed dynamical system in $\varepsilon$. Three timescales emerge: a fast timescale of oscillations along the sharpest direction, an intermediate timescale of the self-stabilization mechanism, and a slow timescale of the dynamics along the minimizers of $g$-the central flow. Using the method of multiple scales, a classical formal method from singular perturbation theory, we derive the expansion of the dynamics in $\varepsilon$: the central flow emerges as the leading-order term in the expansion, while the self-stabilization mechanism appears in the next-order term. We study this mechanism beyond previous analyses: with a single eigenvalue at the edge of stability, we compute the slow drift of the energy of the fluctuations; with several eigenvalues at the edge of stability, we derive the self-stabilization system and explain why fluctuations persist.
Abstract:The central flow of Cohen et al. (2025) is an empirically accurate continuous-time model of gradient descent at the edge of stability in deep learning, However, its derivation is heuristic. We propose a perturbative regime in which the central flow is the limit of gradient descent: we assume that the loss decomposes as $f = g + \varepsilon h$; in the limit $\varepsilon \to 0$, the dynamics of gradient descent with learning rate $\eta$ converge to the gradient flow of $h$ constrained to the minimizers of $g$ of sharpness at most $2/\eta$. Our approach is formal rather than rigorous; it treats gradient descent as a singularly perturbed dynamical system in $\varepsilon$. Three timescales emerge: a fast timescale of oscillations along the sharpest direction, an intermediate timescale of the self-stabilization mechanism, and a slow timescale of the dynamics along the minimizers of $g$-the central flow. Using the method of multiple scales, a classical formal method from singular perturbation theory, we derive the expansion of the dynamics in $\varepsilon$: the central flow emerges as the leading-order term in the expansion, while the self-stabilization mechanism appears in the next-order term. We study this mechanism beyond previous analyses: with a single eigenvalue at the edge of stability, we compute the slow drift of the energy of the fluctuations; with several eigenvalues at the edge of stability, we derive the self-stabilization system and explain why fluctuations persist.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Optimization and Control (math.OC); Machine Learning (stat.ML)
arXiv:2609.01034 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2609.01034v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.01034 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 333 words
Related coverage
NICE: Scale-Stable Perturbations for Graph Neural Network Explanations via Noise Corruption
arXiv · Aug 18, 2026
Gradient descent at the Edge of Stability: free energy model and kinetic description of the two-layer network
arXiv · Jun 6, 2026
Optimization Risk Bounds for Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks Trained by DP-SGD with Correlated Noise
arXiv · Sep 30, 2026

How controllers from industrial machinery can coordinate multitask machine learning
Amazon Science · Jul 30, 2026