Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Safety

aiqbench analysis

This research establishes a theoretical framework linking prompt informativeness and model quality directly to response uncertainty in large language models. By identifying four specific sources of uncertainty, the study provides actionable insights for deploying LLMs safely in high-stakes sectors like healthcare and finance. The findings confirm that increasing task-relevant information or improving model fidelity effectively reduces epistemic uncertainty in generated outputs.
Sources coveringarXiv, Proton Blog, LessWrong
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Prompting the Unknown: Understanding Response Uncertainty in Large Language Models

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2407.14845v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are widely used in decision-making across diverse domains. Ensuring the generation of safe and reliable responses is critical for the effective deployment of LLM-based applications, particularly in high-stakes domains such as healthcare and finance. Most of these applications typically use carefully crafted prompts to guide response generation; however, the relationship between prompts and the reliability of LLM-generated responses is not yet fully understood. To address this gap, we propose a novel prompt-response concept model that explains the relationship between the amount of task-relevant information (informativeness) provided in the prompt and the LLM-generated response uncertainty by identifying four sources of response uncertainty: prompt underspecification, model quality, task variability, and semantic redundancy. We prove that response uncertainty decreases as prompt informativeness or model quality increases, mirroring the behavior of epistemic uncertainty in probabilistic models. Our experimental results on real-world datasets further validate our proposed model and corroborate the theoretical results.

Abstract:Large language models (LLMs) are widely used in decision-making across diverse domains. Ensuring the generation of safe and reliable responses is critical for the effective deployment of LLM-based applications, particularly in high-stakes domains such as healthcare and finance. Most of these applications typically use carefully crafted prompts to guide response generation; however, the relationship between prompts and the reliability of LLM-generated responses is not yet fully understood. To address this gap, we propose a novel prompt-response concept model that explains the relationship between the amount of task-relevant information (informativeness) provided in the prompt and the LLM-generated response uncertainty by identifying four sources of response uncertainty: prompt underspecification, model quality, task variability, and semantic redundancy. We prove that response uncertainty decreases as prompt informativeness or model quality increases, mirroring the behavior of epistemic uncertainty in probabilistic models. Our experimental results on real-world datasets further validate our proposed model and corroborate the theoretical results.

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Computation and Language (cs.CL)

arXiv:2407.14845 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2407.14845v4 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2407.14845 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 248 words

Related coverage