aiqbench analysis
This survey paper examines the application of generative AI for procedural content generation (PCG), highlighting its utility in creating terrains, items, and narratives while addressing critical data scarcity challenges. The authors argue that advancing this field requires overcoming limitations related to domain-specific training datasets rather than relying on generic models alone.
Procedural Content Generation via Generative Artificial Intelligence
arXiv:2407.09013v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: The attempt to utilize machine learning in PCG has been made in the past. In this survey paper, we investigate how generative artificial intelligence (AI), which saw a significant increase in interest in the mid-2010s, is being used for PCG. We review applications of generative AI for the creation of various types of content, including terrains, items, and even storylines. While generative AI is effective for PCG, one significant issues it faces is that building high-performance generative AI requires vast amounts of training data. Because content generally highly customized, domain-specific training data is scarce, and straightforward approaches to generative AI models may not work well. For PCG research to advance further, issues related to limited training data must be overcome. Thus, we also give special consideration to research that addresses the challenges posed by limited training data.
Abstract:The attempt to utilize machine learning in PCG has been made in the past. In this survey paper, we investigate how generative artificial intelligence (AI), which saw a significant increase in interest in the mid-2010s, is being used for PCG. We review applications of generative AI for the creation of various types of content, including terrains, items, and even storylines. While generative AI is effective for PCG, one significant issues it faces is that building high-performance generative AI requires vast amounts of training data. Because content generally highly customized, domain-specific training data is scarce, and straightforward approaches to generative AI models may not work well. For PCG research to advance further, issues related to limited training data must be overcome. Thus, we also give special consideration to research that addresses the challenges posed by limited training data.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2407.09013 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2407.09013v2 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2407.09013 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
https://doi.org/10.4036/iis.2026.R.01 Focus to learn more DOI(s) linking to related resources
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 242 words
Related coverage

Article: Artificial Intelligence-Driven Phishing: How Phishing Technique Is Evolving and Implemented
InfoQ · Jun 8, 2026

Digital States 2026: AI Moves From Experiment to Infrastructure
govtech.com · Sep 24, 2026
Human-Aligned Procedural Level Generation Reinforcement Learning via Text-Level-Sketch Shared Representation
arXiv · Jul 20, 2026

Introducing Gemma 4 models on Amazon Bedrock
AWS · Jun 15, 2026