Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This study evaluates five RAG system variants against French PDFs, revealing that accurate page selection is the critical bottleneck rather than semantic retrieval alone. While query decomposition offers the highest performance gains, it introduces significant latency and output artifacts, suggesting a trade-off between precision and efficiency in document-grounded AI tasks. The findings highlight specific architectural improvements needed to enhance retrieval quality for specialized document queries.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Page-Aware Retrieval-Augmented Generation for EvalLLM 2026: A Five-Variant Study on French PDFs

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.34776v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We study retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) for questions about French PDF documents when both the answer and its supporting document pages are evaluated. Five system variants add dense retrieval, rank fusion, reranking, and query decomposition to a BM25 baseline. On 595 challenge questions, the complete system scores 0.4450 MRR@10 and 0.4013 Recall@10, compared with 0.3430 and 0.2994 for BM25. Dense retrieval alone and a simple lexical--dense fusion both underperform BM25. Reranking improves the hybrid system, whereas adding query decomposition produces the largest further gain, with higher latency and more detected output artifacts. The complete system slightly exceeds the reported anonymous overall mean on two answer metrics but falls below it on most page-retrieval metrics. These results identify accurate page selection, rather than semantic retrieval in isolation, as the main opportunity for improvement in this setting.

Abstract:We study retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) for questions about French PDF documents when both the answer and its supporting document pages are evaluated. Five system variants add dense retrieval, rank fusion, reranking, and query decomposition to a BM25 baseline. On 595 challenge questions, the complete system scores 0.4450 MRR@10 and 0.4013 Recall@10, compared with 0.3430 and 0.2994 for BM25. Dense retrieval alone and a simple lexical--dense fusion both underperform BM25. Reranking improves the hybrid system, whereas adding query decomposition produces the largest further gain, with higher latency and more detected output artifacts. The complete system slightly exceeds the reported anonymous overall mean on two answer metrics but falls below it on most page-retrieval metrics. These results identify accurate page selection, rather than semantic retrieval in isolation, as the main opportunity for improvement in this setting.

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2609.34776 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2609.34776v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.34776 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 228 words

Related coverage