aiqbench analysis
FinSAgent addresses a critical gap in financial AI by correcting prior-corpus misalignment through corpus-side conditioning and multi-path retrieval strategies. This framework improves answer correctness over standard semantic similarity approaches specifically for the complex, redundant structure of SEC 10-K filings. It represents significant progress in applying specialized RAG architectures to high-stakes regulatory domains where evidential validity outweighs topical relevance.
FinSAgent: Corpus-Aligned Multi-Agent RAG Framework for Evidence-Grounded SEC Filing Question Answering
arXiv:2607.18102v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Financial question answering over U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filings requires retrieving and synthesizing heterogeneous evidence dispersed across long, standardized, and highly redundant disclosures. Existing retrieval-augmented and multi-agent systems typically derive retrieval queries directly from the user's question and rank candidates by semantic similarity. Together, these choices create prior-corpus misalignment: a mismatch between model priors and the target filings' structure, terminology, and evidence standards. As a result, query generation misses corpus-specific evidence, while semantic reranking favors topically similar but evidentially invalid false-positive chunks. We propose FinSAgent, an evidence-grounded multi-agent framework that reframes SEC filing QA as corpus-aligned retrieval planning and corrects both ends with a single principle: inject corpus-side conditioning wherever model priors would otherwise dominate. FinSAgent combines (1) role-specialized agents anchored to the mandated 10-K item structure, (2) database-aware query decomposition that conditions each agent's sub-queries on a lightweight, summary-level view of the local corpus, and (3) multi-path retrieval with a learned feature-gated reranker that separates evidential validity from semantic similarity. Across five offline financial QA benchmarks, FinSAgent improves retrieval coverage and answer correctness over strong single-agent and multi-agent baselines; in a three-arm randomized online experiment with 1,000 anonymous user ratings, it also receives higher scores than baselines.
arXiv:2607.18102 (cs)
Authors:Jijun Chi (3), Zhenghan Tai (1 and 3), Hanwei Wu (1 and 12), Tung Sum Thomas Kwok (1 and 4), Hailin He (1), Zixing Liao (1), Bohuai Xiao (1), Chaolong Jiang (1), Jianliang Lei (1), Jerry Huang (7 and 9), Peng Lu (7), Muzhi Li (5), Liheng Ma (1 and 2 and 9), Yihong Wu (7), Sicheng Lyu (1 and 2 and 9), Jingrui Tian (2), Yihan Li (8), Yanzhang Ma (1 and 11), Dingtao Hu (2), Yufei Cui (2), Ling Zhou (10), Lei Ding (1 and 6), Xinyu Wang (1 and 2) ((1) SimpleWay.AI, (2) McGill University, (3) University of Toronto, (4) University of California, Los Angeles, (5) The Chinese University of Hong Kong, (6) University of Manitoba, (7) Université de Montréal, (8) Boston University, (9) Mila - Quebec AI Institute, (10) CG Matrix Technology Limited, (11) Lakehead University, (12) McMaster University)
Abstract:Financial question answering over U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filings requires retrieving and synthesizing heterogeneous evidence dispersed across long, standardized, and highly redundant disclosures. Existing retrieval-augmented and multi-agent systems typically derive retrieval queries directly from the user's question and rank candidates by semantic similarity. Together, these choices create prior-corpus misalignment: a mismatch between model priors and the target filings' structure, terminology, and evidence standards. As a result, query generation misses corpus-specific evidence, while semantic reranking favors topically similar but evidentially invalid false-positive chunks. We propose FinSAgent, an evidence-grounded multi-agent framework that reframes SEC filing QA as corpus-aligned retrieval planning and corrects both ends with a single principle: inject corpus-side conditioning wherever model priors would otherwise dominate. FinSAgent combines (1) role-specialized agents anchored to the mandated 10-K item structure, (2) database-aware query decomposition that conditions each agent's sub-queries on a lightweight, summary-level view of the local corpus, and (3) multi-path retrieval with a learned feature-gated reranker that separates evidential validity from semantic similarity. Across five offline financial QA benchmarks, FinSAgent improves retrieval coverage and answer correctness over strong single-agent and multi-agent baselines; in a three-arm randomized online experiment with 1,000 anonymous user ratings, it also receives higher scores than baselines.
Information Retrieval (cs.IR); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Multiagent Systems (cs.MA)
H.3.3, I.2.7, I.2.11
arXiv:2607.18102 [cs.IR]
(or arXiv:2607.18102v1 [cs.IR] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.18102 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 445 words
Related coverage
From Vector Search to Agentic RAG: Building an Enterprise Research Analyst with hipVS
AMD · Jul 15, 2026

[AINews] Reality Checks on AI News (Yegge shuts down Gas Town, Databricks’ +60% Astra cost)
Latent Space · Sep 17, 2026

Research Note: Filtering Subversion-Relevant Information From Pretraining Data Is Feasible
LessWrong · Oct 5, 2026

Granite 4.2 LLMs: How They're Built
Hugging Face · Aug 25, 2026