Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Products

aiqbench analysis

This research investigates triadic human-robot collaboration for autonomous packing, comparing the efficacy of voice agents against human experts in mediating resident preferences. The study finds that voice agents can achieve comparable outcomes to human teleoperators while reducing the need for continuous expert involvement, though perceived reliability remains a challenge. This work advances the practical deployment of personalized robotics by addressing the scalability bottleneck inherent in current teleoperation models.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Pack It My Way: Triadic Human-Robot Collaboration for Personalized Autonomous Packing

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.04620v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Personalized autonomous packing requires robots to account for resident preferences that cannot be inferred from scene geometry alone. Expert teleoperators can interpret these preferences and translate them into feasible robot actions, but continuous expert involvement limits scalable deployment. In this paper, we investigate triadic human-robot collaboration among a resident, a correction mediator, and a robot by comparing human-expert and voice-agent mediation. We evaluate the two conditions in a user study across Protection, Compactness, andGrouping tasks, using a Show-Correct-Generalize process to assess preference correction and subsequent generalization after the surrounding objects are rearranged. Results show that voice-agent mediation achieves outcomes comparable to human-expert mediation in two of the three preference categories, despite receiving shorter and less detailed instructions. Both mediators are similarly easy to use, although the human expert is perceived as more reliable. These findings demonstrate the potential of voice agents to reduce expert involvement while identifying perceived reliability and preference generalization as remaining challenges.

Abstract:Personalized autonomous packing requires robots to account for resident preferences that cannot be inferred from scene geometry alone. Expert teleoperators can interpret these preferences and translate them into feasible robot actions, but continuous expert involvement limits scalable deployment. In this paper, we investigate triadic human-robot collaboration among a resident, a correction mediator, and a robot by comparing human-expert and voice-agent mediation. We evaluate the two conditions in a user study across Protection, Compactness, andGrouping tasks, using a Show-Correct-Generalize process to assess preference correction and subsequent generalization after the surrounding objects are rearranged. Results show that voice-agent mediation achieves outcomes comparable to human-expert mediation in two of the three preference categories, despite receiving shorter and less detailed instructions. Both mediators are similarly easy to use, although the human expert is perceived as more reliable. These findings demonstrate the potential of voice agents to reduce expert involvement while identifying perceived reliability and preference generalization as remaining challenges.

Robotics (cs.RO)

arXiv:2609.04620 [cs.RO]

(or arXiv:2609.04620v1 [cs.RO] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.04620 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 248 words

Related coverage