Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This paper studies policy gradient methods, a core reinforcement learning technique, applied to the linear quadratic Gaussian control problem. Its contribution is theoretical: a history-based parameterization that recovers gradient dominance, which gives global convergence guarantees, with model-based and model-free results for finite history lengths. The work is mainly relevant to researchers working on the convergence theory of policy gradient methods and to control theorists bridging RL and classical control. It does not present empirical benchmarks or deployed systems.
Sources coveringarXiv, Latent Space, AWS

On the Gradient Domination of the LQG Problem

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2507.09026v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We consider solutions to the linear quadratic Gaussian (LQG) regulator problem via policy gradient (PG) methods. Although PG methods have demonstrated strong theoretical guarantees in solving the linear quadratic regulator (LQR) problem, despite its nonconvex landscape, their theoretical understanding in the LQG setting remains limited. Notably, the LQG problem lacks gradient dominance in the classical parameterization, i.e., with a dynamic controller, which hinders global convergence guarantees. In this work, we study a PG method for the LQG problem by adopting an alternative parameterization of the set of stabilizing controllers and employing a lifting argument. We refer to this parameterization as a history representation of the control input as it is parameterized by past input and output data from the previous p time-steps. Under this parameterization, the infinite-history LQG optimization reduces to an equivalent static state-feedback LQR problem, allowing us to recover gradient dominance and smoothness. For finite history length p, we establish model-based and model-free convergence guarantees up to a geometrically decaying history-truncation error.

Abstract:We consider solutions to the linear quadratic Gaussian (LQG) regulator problem via policy gradient (PG) methods. Although PG methods have demonstrated strong theoretical guarantees in solving the linear quadratic regulator (LQR) problem, despite its nonconvex landscape, their theoretical understanding in the LQG setting remains limited. Notably, the LQG problem lacks gradient dominance in the classical parameterization, i.e., with a dynamic controller, which hinders global convergence guarantees. In this work, we study a PG method for the LQG problem by adopting an alternative parameterization of the set of stabilizing controllers and employing a lifting argument. We refer to this parameterization as a history representation of the control input as it is parameterized by past input and output data from the previous p time-steps. Under this parameterization, the infinite-history LQG optimization reduces to an equivalent static state-feedback LQR problem, allowing us to recover gradient dominance and smoothness. For finite history length p, we establish model-based and model-free convergence guarantees up to a geometrically decaying history-truncation error.

Optimization and Control (math.OC); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Systems and Control (eess.SY)

arXiv:2507.09026 [math.OC]

(or arXiv:2507.09026v2 [math.OC] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2507.09026 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 264 words

Related coverage