aiqbench analysis
This research introduces GradSAT, a hybrid solver that integrates Multi-Task Learning with dynamic gradient normalization to overcome the "gradient domination" bottleneck in floating-point SMT solving. By treating individual constraints as independent tasks and balancing their optimization trajectories, the framework achieves more uniform convergence for software verification and compiler testing. The approach combines a GPU-accelerated continuous relaxation phase with a bit-precise local search engine to deliver robust, parallelizable solutions for complex logical formulas.
Accelerating Floating-Point Satisfiability Solving via Gradient Normalization
arXiv:2610.08808v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Satisfiability Modulo Theories (SMT) solvers are foundational to software verification, program analysis, and compiler testing, particularly over the theory of Quantifier-Free Floating-Point (QF_FP). While recent optimization-based SMT solvers have successfully applied gradient descent to continuous relaxations of logical formulas, they are fundamentally bottlenecked by gradient domination, a phenomenon where a small subset of difficult clauses hijacks the optimization trajectory, preventing the solver from satisfying the broader formula and trapping it in local minima. To overcome this, we present GradSAT, a novel framework that bridges optimization-based SMT solving with Multi-Task Learning (MTL). GradSAT reformulates the constraint satisfaction process by treating each SMT clause as an independent MTL task. By applying dynamic gradient normalization (GradNorm), GradSAT actively balances the gradient magnitudes across all clauses at runtime, systematically penalizing dominant gradients and accelerating lagging clauses to ensure uniform convergence. GradSAT implements this through a highly optimized, two-stage hybrid pipeline. First, a GPU-accelerated PyTorch backend leveraging symbolic compilation and operator fusion navigates the continuous relaxation to a high-quality basin. Second, the candidate assignment is handed off to a bit-precise local search engine to rapidly resolve the exact, rigorous assignment. By stabilizing the continuous search dynamics, GradSAT mitigates the brittleness of prior gradient-based solvers and provides a robust, highly parallelizable architecture for complex constraint solving.
Abstract:Satisfiability Modulo Theories (SMT) solvers are foundational to software verification, program analysis, and compiler testing, particularly over the theory of Quantifier-Free Floating-Point (QF_FP). While recent optimization-based SMT solvers have successfully applied gradient descent to continuous relaxations of logical formulas, they are fundamentally bottlenecked by gradient domination, a phenomenon where a small subset of difficult clauses hijacks the optimization trajectory, preventing the solver from satisfying the broader formula and trapping it in local minima. To overcome this, we present GradSAT, a novel framework that bridges optimization-based SMT solving with Multi-Task Learning (MTL). GradSAT reformulates the constraint satisfaction process by treating each SMT clause as an independent MTL task. By applying dynamic gradient normalization (GradNorm), GradSAT actively balances the gradient magnitudes across all clauses at runtime, systematically penalizing dominant gradients and accelerating lagging clauses to ensure uniform convergence. GradSAT implements this through a highly optimized, two-stage hybrid pipeline. First, a GPU-accelerated PyTorch backend leveraging symbolic compilation and operator fusion navigates the continuous relaxation to a high-quality basin. Second, the candidate assignment is handed off to a bit-precise local search engine to rapidly resolve the exact, rigorous assignment. By stabilizing the continuous search dynamics, GradSAT mitigates the brittleness of prior gradient-based solvers and provides a robust, highly parallelizable architecture for complex constraint solving.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
D.2.4; F.3.1; F.4.1
arXiv:2610.08808 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2610.08808v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.08808 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 308 words
Related coverage

Game Design Creativity evals
LessWrong · Oct 12, 2026

My Assessment of Plan A's Compute Verification Strategy (+ open questions)
LessWrong · Jul 30, 2026

RL & search is a terrifying way to build AGI (an FAQ)
AI Alignment Forum · Jul 27, 2026

Exploding variance of means of exponentials: least-squares to the rescue – Machine Learning Research Blog
francisbach.com · Sep 27, 2026