aiqbench analysis
This research establishes fundamental computational limits for probabilistic modeling in high-dimensional machine learning by proving that the compatibility problem becomes intractable when conditionals are encoded as arithmetic circuits. The findings reveal that determining whether two succinctly encoded conditional distributions can form a valid joint distribution is co-NP-complete or PSPACE-complete, posing significant theoretical challenges for neural network architectures and generative models. These results highlight inherent trade-offs between model expressivity and computational feasibility in modern probabilistic frameworks.
On the Complexity of the Compatibility Problem for Succinctly Encoded Conditional Distributions
arXiv:2608.31120v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The motivation for this paper is the investigation of the trade-offs implicit in probabilistic models used in machine learning. Models are often used to make predictions in the form of conditional probabilities. However, a pair of conditional distributions p(x|y) and p(y|x) may not be compatible with any joint distribution p(x,y). Given two such conditionals, determining if there exists a compatible joint is known as the compatibility problem. For discrete random variables, when the conditionals are encoded as probability tables, the compatibility problem has a known solution, which is computationally tractable. In this paper, we formalise and study a succinct version of the problem, encoding conditional distributions as arithmetic circuits. This is applicable to practical applications of probabilistic modelling in high-dimensional settings, including neural network models. We show that, for succinct circuit representations of conditionals, the compatibility problem is intractable. In the case that all probabilities are non-zero, the problem is co-NP-complete. In the case that probabilities can be zero, we give examples to demonstrate that several notions of compatibility can be distinguished, and we prove that multiple versions of the problem are PSPACE-complete. Furthermore, we show that, assuming the polynomial hierarchy does not collapse, there exist compatible succinct conditionals whose joint cannot be expressed succinctly. Implications of these results for probabilistic modelling and machine learning are discussed.
Abstract:The motivation for this paper is the investigation of the trade-offs implicit in probabilistic models used in machine learning. Models are often used to make predictions in the form of conditional probabilities. However, a pair of conditional distributions p(x|y) and p(y|x) may not be compatible with any joint distribution p(x,y). Given two such conditionals, determining if there exists a compatible joint is known as the compatibility problem. For discrete random variables, when the conditionals are encoded as probability tables, the compatibility problem has a known solution, which is computationally tractable. In this paper, we formalise and study a succinct version of the problem, encoding conditional distributions as arithmetic circuits. This is applicable to practical applications of probabilistic modelling in high-dimensional settings, including neural network models. We show that, for succinct circuit representations of conditionals, the compatibility problem is intractable. In the case that all probabilities are non-zero, the problem is co-NP-complete. In the case that probabilities can be zero, we give examples to demonstrate that several notions of compatibility can be distinguished, and we prove that multiple versions of the problem are PSPACE-complete. Furthermore, we show that, assuming the polynomial hierarchy does not collapse, there exist compatible succinct conditionals whose joint cannot be expressed succinctly. Implications of these results for probabilistic modelling and machine learning are discussed.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Computational Complexity (cs.CC); Probability (math.PR)
arXiv:2608.31120 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2608.31120v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.31120 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 316 words
Related coverage

News
Quantum Computing Report · Jul 25, 2026
Running Variational Quantum Eigensolver with Qiskit Aer on AMD Instinct
AMD · May 29, 2026

The Companies Building Quantum Computing Chips in 2026
The Quantum Insider · Jun 5, 2026

Informe de riesgos de la IA de frontera (febrero–marzo de 2026)
METR · May 19, 2026