Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This arXiv paper is squarely about AI: discrete diffusion models, a generative ML technique, and how to sample from them under conditional constraints without retraining. The core contribution is a theoretical KL-divergence bound for score-mismatched sampling, plus a proposed Randomized Hard Clamping sampler for coordinatewise set constraints. Readers working on text infilling or constrained generation should note that the analysis tracks how bias grows with dimension and vocabulary size, while the empirical validation remains the part to check against their own setups.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Score Mismatch and Set-Constrained Sampling in Zero-Shot Conditional Discrete Diffusion

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2610.21061v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Discrete diffusion models have become a powerful framework for modeling complex discrete distributions across a range of applications. While theoretical convergence guarantees depend on consistency between the target and training distributions, such a case rarely holds in practice, making score mismatch a central challenge in discrete diffusion sampling. This is particularly relevant to zero-shot conditional generation, where a model trained on the unconditional distribution is directly reused at inference time to sample from a conditional target distribution. In this paper, we provide the first theoretical analysis for score-mismatched discrete diffusion models and derive a general KL divergence upper bound that clearly identifies the additional bias caused by such a mismatch. Our analysis covers partial-observation constraints, including text infilling, sentence completion, and more general coordinatewise set constraints. Specifically, we analyze the classical Conditional SEDD sampler and show that it can incur a bias term that scales with the dimension, vocabulary size, and compatibility. Based on this analysis, we propose a Randomized Hard Clamping (RHC) sampler for coordinatewise set constraints. We show that the assignment probabilities can be expressed exactly by the unconditional scores with absorbing rate. Finally, numerical and real-data experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed RHC sampler.

Abstract:Discrete diffusion models have become a powerful framework for modeling complex discrete distributions across a range of applications. While theoretical convergence guarantees depend on consistency between the target and training distributions, such a case rarely holds in practice, making score mismatch a central challenge in discrete diffusion sampling. This is particularly relevant to zero-shot conditional generation, where a model trained on the unconditional distribution is directly reused at inference time to sample from a conditional target distribution. In this paper, we provide the first theoretical analysis for score-mismatched discrete diffusion models and derive a general KL divergence upper bound that clearly identifies the additional bias caused by such a mismatch. Our analysis covers partial-observation constraints, including text infilling, sentence completion, and more general coordinatewise set constraints. Specifically, we analyze the classical Conditional SEDD sampler and show that it can incur a bias term that scales with the dimension, vocabulary size, and compatibility. Based on this analysis, we propose a Randomized Hard Clamping (RHC) sampler for coordinatewise set constraints. We show that the assignment probabilities can be expressed exactly by the unconditional scores with absorbing rate. Finally, numerical and real-data experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed RHC sampler.

Machine Learning (stat.ML); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2610.21061 [stat.ML]

(or arXiv:2610.21061v1 [stat.ML] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.21061 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 295 words

Related coverage