Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

OCT-FedSIR addresses a critical bottleneck in medical AI by enabling robust federated learning for ophthalmic imaging despite unreliable annotations and data heterogeneity across institutions. The framework's ability to spectrally identify and correct corrupted labels without discarding valuable client data offers a practical pathway toward trustworthy, privacy-preserving model development in clinical settings.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

OCT-FedSIR: Toward Trustworthy Federated Ophthalmic Learning under Annotation Noise

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.14734v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Federated learning enables collaborative model development without centralizing patient data, but annotation reliability at participating institutions cannot always be assumed. In ophthalmic imaging, differences in disease prevalence and class composition can resemble changes caused by corrupted supervision. We introduce OCT-FedSIR, a reliability-aware spectral framework for federated OCT classification under client-dependent annotation noise and heterogeneous data distributions. OCT-FedSIR combines class-balanced spectral estimation, Stage-I logit adjustment, complementary spectral descriptors, selective spectral relabeling, and noise-aware federated optimization. We evaluated the framework on the Kermany, University of Illinois Chicago, and Wake Forest datasets under symmetric and structured asymmetric noise and three levels of non-IID heterogeneity. Across 117 experimental conditions, OCT-FedSIR achieved a mean accuracy of 86.73%, compared with 79.94% for RoFL and 78.75% for FedCorr. It correctly separated clients with original and corrupted annotations across all evaluated conditions, while the original FedSIR identification procedure was less robust, particularly under asymmetric noise. Spectral relabeling recovered 77.2% of corrupted annotations with 91.3% correction precision and a 3.5% false-correction rate. Retaining corrected clients outperformed spectral pruning by 9.30 percentage points on average. These findings show that annotation noise can often be identified and corrected without discarding informative client data.

Authors:Sina Gholami, Abdulmoneam Ali, Tania Haghighi, Rashadul H. Badhon, Behafarin Emam, Sally S. Y. Ong, Atalie C. Thompson, Theodore Leng, Ahmed Arafa, Jennifer I. Lim, Minhaj Nur Alam

Abstract:Federated learning enables collaborative model development without centralizing patient data, but annotation reliability at participating institutions cannot always be assumed. In ophthalmic imaging, differences in disease prevalence and class composition can resemble changes caused by corrupted supervision. We introduce OCT-FedSIR, a reliability-aware spectral framework for federated OCT classification under client-dependent annotation noise and heterogeneous data distributions. OCT-FedSIR combines class-balanced spectral estimation, Stage-I logit adjustment, complementary spectral descriptors, selective spectral relabeling, and noise-aware federated optimization. We evaluated the framework on the Kermany, University of Illinois Chicago, and Wake Forest datasets under symmetric and structured asymmetric noise and three levels of non-IID heterogeneity. Across 117 experimental conditions, OCT-FedSIR achieved a mean accuracy of 86.73%, compared with 79.94% for RoFL and 78.75% for FedCorr. It correctly separated clients with original and corrupted annotations across all evaluated conditions, while the original FedSIR identification procedure was less robust, particularly under asymmetric noise. Spectral relabeling recovered 77.2% of corrupted annotations with 91.3% correction precision and a 3.5% false-correction rate. Retaining corrected clients outperformed spectral pruning by 9.30 percentage points on average. These findings show that annotation noise can often be identified and corrected without discarding informative client data.

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing (cs.DC)

arXiv:2609.14734 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2609.14734v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.14734 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 247 words

Related coverage