aiqbench analysis
This research establishes a fundamental limitation in quantum property testing, proving that efficient testers analogous to classical low-degree polynomial checks do not exist for certain phase states. The study reveals that verifying these specific quantum codewords requires an exponentially large number of state copies relative to the parameters defining the underlying Reed-Muller codes. This negative result clarifies the intrinsic complexity gap between classical and quantum testing regimes, offering critical theoretical bounds for future protocols relying on low-degree approximations in high-dimensional Hilbert spaces.
No low-degree tests for quantum states
arXiv:2608.00265v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We study the problem of testing low-degree phase states, namely m-qudit quantum states of the form $q^{-m/2} \sum_{x \in \mathbb{F}_q^m} \omega^{f(x)} |x>$, where $f$ is a degree-$d$ polynomial. In contrast to the classical setting, where low-degree polynomials admit highly efficient classical testers, it is not known whether analogous quantum tests exist. We show that no such quantum low-degree test exists: any tester requires $\Omega(\binom{\lfloor m/2\rfloor}{\lfloor (d-1)/2 \rfloor})$ copies to determine whether a given state is a degree-$d$ phase state or is far from every such state. Our results follow from a general framework that relates quantum testing of codeword phase states to classical decoding properties of the dual code, which allows us to leverage known bounds on the tolerance of high-rate Reed--Muller codes to random errors.
Abstract:We study the problem of testing low-degree phase states, namely m-qudit quantum states of the form $q^{-m/2} \sum_{x \in \mathbb{F}_q^m} \omega^{f(x)} |x>$, where $f$ is a degree-$d$ polynomial. In contrast to the classical setting, where low-degree polynomials admit highly efficient classical testers, it is not known whether analogous quantum tests exist. We show that no such quantum low-degree test exists: any tester requires $\Omega(\binom{\lfloor m/2\rfloor}{\lfloor (d-1)/2 \rfloor})$ copies to determine whether a given state is a degree-$d$ phase state or is far from every such state. Our results follow from a general framework that relates quantum testing of codeword phase states to classical decoding properties of the dual code, which allows us to leverage known bounds on the tolerance of high-rate Reed--Muller codes to random errors.
Quantum Physics (quant-ph); Computational Complexity (cs.CC)
arXiv:2608.00265 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2608.00265v1 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.00265 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 223 words
Related coverage

Andrew Dzurak, The Engineer Turning Ordinary Transistors Into Qubits
Quantum Zeitgeist · Sep 4, 2026

Is The Brain A Quantum Computer? The Decoherence Numbers Say No
Quantum Zeitgeist · Sep 13, 2026

Quantum Bell-triplet states emerge from 151 MeV proton collisions
Quantum Zeitgeist · Oct 11, 2026

News
Quantum Computing Report · Jun 7, 2026