Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Products

aiqbench analysis

This research identifies a critical performance bottleneck in Multi-Agent Systems, revealing that indiscriminately expanding model pools often degrades results compared to using a single top-performing base model. The study concludes that selecting candidates within a single model family is the most effective strategy for maintaining stability and maximizing reasoning capabilities on scientific benchmarks. These findings offer essential guidance for engineers designing complex agent architectures, emphasizing that model selection logic is as vital as raw compute power.
Sources coveringarXiv, Meta Engineering
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Mo' Models, Mo' Problems: How to best select model pools when designing Multi-Agent Systems

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.17306v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Multi-agent Systems (MAS) combine multiple model outputs to solve complex reasoning tasks. However, despite rapid growth of available open-source models, there is limited research on how to select optimal model candidates out of this massive pool. We systematically evaluate 8 model selection strategies (including model size, accuracy and answer diversity) across before-generation (routing) and after-generation (majority-voting, LLM-as-a-judge) MAS architectures on challenging scientific benchmarks. Our findings show a significant gap between theoretical oracle potential and actual performance: Expanding candidate pool sizes often degrades performance below that of the top performing base-model. We find that candidate selection within a single model family is the strategy that yields the best relative performance over a standalone model. These results demonstrate that adding arbitrary models to a heterogeneous MAS can introduce system instability, highlighting model selection as a critical design choice for multi-agent systems.

Abstract:Multi-agent Systems (MAS) combine multiple model outputs to solve complex reasoning tasks. However, despite rapid growth of available open-source models, there is limited research on how to select optimal model candidates out of this massive pool. We systematically evaluate 8 model selection strategies (including model size, accuracy and answer diversity) across before-generation (routing) and after-generation (majority-voting, LLM-as-a-judge) MAS architectures on challenging scientific benchmarks. Our findings show a significant gap between theoretical oracle potential and actual performance: Expanding candidate pool sizes often degrades performance below that of the top performing base-model. We find that candidate selection within a single model family is the strategy that yields the best relative performance over a standalone model. These results demonstrate that adding arbitrary models to a heterogeneous MAS can introduce system instability, highlighting model selection as a critical design choice for multi-agent systems.

8 pages main, 23 pages total. Accepted to REALM 2026 as part of EMNLP 2026

Multiagent Systems (cs.MA); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2609.17306 [cs.MA]

(or arXiv:2609.17306v1 [cs.MA] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.17306 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 251 words

Related coverage