aiqbench analysis
Mem++ introduces a non-destructive memory framework for LLM agents that preserves full document versions rather than distilling them at write time, enabling more accurate temporal reasoning in organizational workflows. By deferring selection to read time and fusing lexical and semantic rankings, the system significantly outperforms standard RAG baselines on long-term memory benchmarks without relying on generative models during ingestion. This approach directly addresses the limitations of current systems that overwrite historical data when new decisions are recorded.
Mem++: Non-Destructive Memory for Long-Term Organizational LLM Agents
arXiv:2610.02002v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Language Model (LLM) agents now take part in organizational work, where many authors record decisions across documents over months. Because a revised decision arrives as a new document rather than an edit, answering a question requires knowing which version held at a given time. However, most memory systems compress the record at write time. By distilling each document into facts, notes or graph edges, these methods fix what can be answered before any question is asked. To address this, we propose Mem++, a non-destructive memory framework shifting from write-time distillation to read-time selection. Mem++ stores every document whole with its date and author, and it calls no generative model at write time. At read time, it retrieves only documents dated up to the time a question asks about and fuses lexical and semantic rankings. Unlike systems that overwrite older versions, Mem++ keeps them and leaves the choice to the answering model. Evaluations on the organizational benchmark OrgMemBench demonstrate that Mem++ surpasses the strongest memory system baseline by 8.0 to 13.1 points across two answering models. With gpt-4.1-mini, it also achieves the best overall score, 2.6 points above RAG. In addition, Mem++ achieves the best average LLM-judge score on LoCoMo and ranks second on LongMemEval-S, behind only its entity-graph variant. Code for benchmark evaluation is available at https://github.com/AIDAChip-Inc/mem-plus-plus.
Abstract:Large Language Model (LLM) agents now take part in organizational work, where many authors record decisions across documents over months. Because a revised decision arrives as a new document rather than an edit, answering a question requires knowing which version held at a given time. However, most memory systems compress the record at write time. By distilling each document into facts, notes or graph edges, these methods fix what can be answered before any question is asked. To address this, we propose Mem++, a non-destructive memory framework shifting from write-time distillation to read-time selection. Mem++ stores every document whole with its date and author, and it calls no generative model at write time. At read time, it retrieves only documents dated up to the time a question asks about and fuses lexical and semantic rankings. Unlike systems that overwrite older versions, Mem++ keeps them and leaves the choice to the answering model. Evaluations on the organizational benchmark OrgMemBench demonstrate that Mem++ surpasses the strongest memory system baseline by 8.0 to 13.1 points across two answering models. With gpt-4.1-mini, it also achieves the best overall score, 2.6 points above RAG. In addition, Mem++ achieves the best average LLM-judge score on LoCoMo and ranks second on LongMemEval-S, behind only its entity-graph variant. Code for benchmark evaluation is available at this https URL.
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2610.02002 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2610.02002v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.02002 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 318 words
Related coverage
Workerville: Towards an Organizational Behavior Account of Agent Safety
arXiv · Oct 10, 2026

Game Design Creativity evals
LessWrong · Oct 12, 2026

News
Quantum Computing Report · Jul 25, 2026
Performance Profiling on AMD GPUs – Part 5: Profiling-Driven Kernel Optimization with an AI Code-Assist Tool
AMD · Jul 16, 2026