Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This research reframes tool-use evaluation by separating discovery capabilities into curiosity, recognition, and efficiency metrics rather than relying on aggregate success rates. The study highlights a critical inverse scaling relationship where larger models struggle with recognizing how to construct tools, suggesting diminishing returns for brute-force parameter increases in agentic workflows. By introducing combinatorial games that emulate real-world constraints, the paper offers a more nuanced framework for assessing LLM agent capabilities under resource limitations.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Lomekwi: Resource-Bounded Tool Discovery in LLM Agents

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2607.16961v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Existing tool-use benchmarks report a single success rate for complex, multistep tasks. Inspired by ideas from cognitive science, we distinguish tool use from tool discovery and decompose the latter into curiosity (the model's ability to discover the parts needed to build the tool), recognition (the model's ability to discover the process of creating the tool), and efficiency (the model's use of the tool after creation). We show that this framework can be applied to existing discovery tasks, such as Voyager. In addition, we provide evidence that recognition inversely scales with model size, and we introduce and analyze a class of combinatorial games that demonstrates this. We further observe inverse scaling in a separate environment designed to emulate real-world tasks.

Abstract:Existing tool-use benchmarks report a single success rate for complex, multistep tasks. Inspired by ideas from cognitive science, we distinguish tool use from tool discovery and decompose the latter into curiosity (the model's ability to discover the parts needed to build the tool), recognition (the model's ability to discover the process of creating the tool), and efficiency (the model's use of the tool after creation). We show that this framework can be applied to existing discovery tasks, such as Voyager. In addition, we provide evidence that recognition inversely scales with model size, and we introduce and analyze a class of combinatorial games that demonstrates this. We further observe inverse scaling in a separate environment designed to emulate real-world tasks.

All authors contributed equally. 17 pages, 6 figures. Presented at the 2026 Conference on Learning Theory Workshop on Learning in an Agentic World

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

I.2.6; I.2.11; I.2.7

arXiv:2607.16961 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2607.16961v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.16961 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 239 words

Related coverage