aiqbench analysis
This survey establishes a unified taxonomy for LLM-based agentic reasoning frameworks, categorizing them by single-agent, tool-based, and multi-agent methodologies to clarify their distinct problem-solving capabilities. By mapping these systems across diverse domains like scientific discovery and software engineering, the work provides essential context for evaluating the maturity and applicability of complex autonomous agents in real-world scenarios.
LLM-based Agentic Reasoning Frameworks: A Survey from Methods to Scenarios
arXiv:2508.17692v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Recent advances in LLM-based agents highlight the importance of their reasoning frameworks, which guide the problem-solving process in diverse ways. This survey introduces a unified formal language to systematically categorize these frameworks at three compositional levels: single-agent, tool-based, and multi-agent methods. Following our taxonomy, we review key application scenarios across scientific discovery, healthcare, software engineering, society, economics, and general-purpose tasks. It also compares the distinct features and evaluation strategies of each category. Through our taxonomy and comparisons, our survey explores the designs and strengths of LLM-based agentic frameworks in different scenarios, reviewing the fast-paced development of complex agentic systems in the real world.
Abstract:Recent advances in LLM-based agents highlight the importance of their reasoning frameworks, which guide the problem-solving process in diverse ways. This survey introduces a unified formal language to systematically categorize these frameworks at three compositional levels: single-agent, tool-based, and multi-agent methods. Following our taxonomy, we review key application scenarios across scientific discovery, healthcare, software engineering, society, economics, and general-purpose tasks. It also compares the distinct features and evaluation strategies of each category. Through our taxonomy and comparisons, our survey explores the designs and strengths of LLM-based agentic frameworks in different scenarios, reviewing the fast-paced development of complex agentic systems in the real world.
69 pages,10 figures,13 tables. Work in progress
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2508.17692 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2508.17692v2 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2508.17692 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 206 words
Related coverage

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · Sep 18, 2026

AXRP Episode 50 - Eli Lifland on AI 2027
LessWrong · Aug 3, 2026
Coverage-driven alignment - What ‘Teaching Claude Why’ can borrow from AV verification
LessWrong · Jun 8, 2026
A Comprehensive Survey on Multi-Agent Cooperative Decision-Making: Scenarios, Approaches, Challenges and Perspectives
arXiv · Sep 1, 2026