Sari la conținut

Română · beta. Traducerea a fost făcută automat și este încă în curs de revizuire. Citește pagina în engleză

perspectiva aiqbenchCercetare AI

analiza aiqbench

This survey establishes a unified taxonomy for LLM-based agentic reasoning frameworks, categorizing them by single-agent, tool-based, and multi-agent methodologies to clarify their distinct problem-solving capabilities. By mapping these systems across diverse domains like scientific discovery and software engineering, the work provides essential context for evaluating the maturity and applicability of complex autonomous agents in real-world scenarios.
Sursă care acoperăarXiv
Ce este aceastaLectura unui model asupra articolului și a acoperirii conexe, scrisă pentru aiqbench. Nu sunt cuvintele publicației.

LLM-based Agentic Reasoning Frameworks: A Survey from Methods to Scenarios

arXiv2 min de cititArticolul și perspectiva sunt în engleză.

arXiv:2508.17692v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Recent advances in LLM-based agents highlight the importance of their reasoning frameworks, which guide the problem-solving process in diverse ways. This survey introduces a unified formal language to systematically categorize these frameworks at three compositional levels: single-agent, tool-based, and multi-agent methods. Following our taxonomy, we review key application scenarios across scientific discovery, healthcare, software engineering, society, economics, and general-purpose tasks. It also compares the distinct features and evaluation strategies of each category. Through our taxonomy and comparisons, our survey explores the designs and strengths of LLM-based agentic frameworks in different scenarios, reviewing the fast-paced development of complex agentic systems in the real world.

Abstract:Recent advances in LLM-based agents highlight the importance of their reasoning frameworks, which guide the problem-solving process in diverse ways. This survey introduces a unified formal language to systematically categorize these frameworks at three compositional levels: single-agent, tool-based, and multi-agent methods. Following our taxonomy, we review key application scenarios across scientific discovery, healthcare, software engineering, society, economics, and general-purpose tasks. It also compares the distinct features and evaluation strategies of each category. Through our taxonomy and comparisons, our survey explores the designs and strengths of LLM-based agentic frameworks in different scenarios, reviewing the fast-paced development of complex agentic systems in the real world.

69 pages,10 figures,13 tables. Work in progress

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL)

arXiv:2508.17692 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2508.17692v2 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2508.17692 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 206 cuvinte

Subiecte conexe