aiqbench analysis
This research advances autonomous vehicle safety by optimizing motion planning under conflicting Signal Temporal Logic (STL) specifications using a novel lexicographic approach. The authors transform computationally expensive multi-objective problems into single-objective scalar optimizations via non-uniform quantization, enabling scalable solutions without quadratic input costs. This method ensures system continuity when full specification compliance is impossible by prioritizing critical safety constraints through quantitative violation minimization.
Lexicographic Minimum-Violation Motion Planning using Signal Temporal Logic
arXiv:2604.20428v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Motion planning for autonomous vehicles often requires satisfying multiple conditionally conflicting specifications. In situations where not all specifications can be met simultaneously, minimum-violation motion planning maintains system operation by minimizing violations of specifications in accordance with their priorities. Signal temporal logic (STL) provides a formal language for rigorously defining these specifications and enables the quantitative evaluation of their violations. However, a total ordering of specifications yields a lexicographic optimization problem, which is typically computationally expensive to solve using standard methods. We address this problem by transforming the multi-objective lexicographic optimization problem into a single-objective scalar optimization problem using non-uniform quantization and bit-shifting. Specifically, we extend a deterministic model predictive path integral (MPPI) solver to efficiently solve optimization problems without quadratic input cost. Additionally, a novel predicate-robustness measure that combines spatial and temporal violations is introduced. Our results show that the proposed method offers an interpretable and scalable solution for lexicographic STL minimum-violation motion planning within a single-objective solver framework.
Abstract:Motion planning for autonomous vehicles often requires satisfying multiple conditionally conflicting specifications. In situations where not all specifications can be met simultaneously, minimum-violation motion planning maintains system operation by minimizing violations of specifications in accordance with their priorities. Signal temporal logic (STL) provides a formal language for rigorously defining these specifications and enables the quantitative evaluation of their violations. However, a total ordering of specifications yields a lexicographic optimization problem, which is typically computationally expensive to solve using standard methods. We address this problem by transforming the multi-objective lexicographic optimization problem into a single-objective scalar optimization problem using non-uniform quantization and bit-shifting. Specifically, we extend a deterministic model predictive path integral (MPPI) solver to efficiently solve optimization problems without quadratic input cost. Additionally, a novel predicate-robustness measure that combines spatial and temporal violations is introduced. Our results show that the proposed method offers an interpretable and scalable solution for lexicographic STL minimum-violation motion planning within a single-objective solver framework.
Robotics (cs.RO)
arXiv:2604.20428 [cs.RO]
(or arXiv:2604.20428v2 [cs.RO] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.20428 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 250 words
Related coverage
Lexicographic Minimum-Violation Motion Planning using Signal Temporal Logic
arXiv · Aug 20, 2026

[AINews] Opus 5.5 is good at explainer videos
Latent Space · Sep 29, 2026
If This Were a Test, How Much Would It Cost?
LessWrong · Jun 16, 2026

Informe de riesgos de la IA de frontera (febrero–marzo de 2026)
METR · May 19, 2026