aiqbench analysis
This research advances motion planning algorithms by efficiently solving lexicographic optimization problems using Signal Temporal Logic (STL) to handle conflicting safety specifications in autonomous systems. By transforming multi-objective constraints into a single objective via bit-shifting, the method reduces computational cost while maintaining interpretability for complex robotic scenarios.
Lexicographic Minimum-Violation Motion Planning using Signal Temporal Logic
arXiv:2604.20428v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Motion planning for autonomous vehicles often requires satisfying multiple conditionally conflicting specifications. In situations where not all specifications can be met simultaneously, minimum-violation motion planning maintains system operation by minimizing violations of specifications in accordance with their priorities. Signal temporal logic (STL) provides a formal language for rigorously defining these specifications and enables the quantitative evaluation of their violations. However, a total ordering of specifications yields a lexicographic optimization problem, which is typically computationally expensive to solve using standard methods. We address this problem by discretizing the multi-objective lexicographic optimization problem via non-uniform quantization and transforming it into a single-objective optimization problem using bit-shifting. Specifically, we extend a deterministic model predictive path integral (MPPI) solver to efficiently solve optimization problems without quadratic input cost. Additionally, a novel predicate robustness measure that combines spatial and temporal violations is introduced. Our results show that the proposed method offers an interpretable and scalable solution for lexicographic STL minimum-violation motion planning using a single-objective solver.
Abstract:Motion planning for autonomous vehicles often requires satisfying multiple conditionally conflicting specifications. In situations where not all specifications can be met simultaneously, minimum-violation motion planning maintains system operation by minimizing violations of specifications in accordance with their priorities. Signal temporal logic (STL) provides a formal language for rigorously defining these specifications and enables the quantitative evaluation of their violations. However, a total ordering of specifications yields a lexicographic optimization problem, which is typically computationally expensive to solve using standard methods. We address this problem by discretizing the multi-objective lexicographic optimization problem via non-uniform quantization and transforming it into a single-objective optimization problem using bit-shifting. Specifically, we extend a deterministic model predictive path integral (MPPI) solver to efficiently solve optimization problems without quadratic input cost. Additionally, a novel predicate robustness measure that combines spatial and temporal violations is introduced. Our results show that the proposed method offers an interpretable and scalable solution for lexicographic STL minimum-violation motion planning using a single-objective solver.
Robotics (cs.RO)
arXiv:2604.20428 [cs.RO]
(or arXiv:2604.20428v3 [cs.RO] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2604.20428 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 252 words
Related coverage
Lexicographic Minimum-Violation Motion Planning using Signal Temporal Logic
arXiv · Jun 12, 2026

[AINews] Opus 5.5 is good at explainer videos
Latent Space · Sep 29, 2026
If This Were a Test, How Much Would It Cost?
LessWrong · Jun 16, 2026

Informe de riesgos de la IA de frontera (febrero–marzo de 2026)
METR · May 19, 2026