Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This research reframes the challenge of handling underspecified user intents in AI assistants as a value-of-information problem, optimizing how models allocate limited interaction turns to recover utility. By applying a reinforcement learning framework specifically to image generation tasks, the study demonstrates that strategically asking more informative questions significantly improves outcome accuracy while reducing total interaction time and cost. The findings offer a scalable approach for training language models to better disambiguate user goals without relying on speculative guesses.
Sources coveringarXiv, AI Alignment Forum
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Learning to Clarify Underspecified Intents Under Limited Interaction

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2610.04719v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: AI assistants receive requests that leave out information needed for a good outcome, for example about users' preferences or goals. They must then either speculate or ask for more information before proceeding. We reconceptualize this as a value-of-information problem: the assistant should acquire information whose absence causes the greatest avoidable loss in user utility. This is rarely known ex ante; rather, assistants must predict it in order to optimally allocate limited user interactions. We instantiate this problem in image generation and derive a reinforcement learning framework using multi-turn simulated users to maximize utility recovery under uncertainty. In a preregistered study with 456 interactive sessions across 76 human participants, this helped users significantly better match reference images with significantly fewer questions, less total interaction time, and lower cost. This points toward a simple and scalable framework for training language model assistants to better disambiguate user intent by asking more informative questions.

Abstract:AI assistants receive requests that leave out information needed for a good outcome, for example about users' preferences or goals. They must then either speculate or ask for more information before proceeding. We reconceptualize this as a value-of-information problem: the assistant should acquire information whose absence causes the greatest avoidable loss in user utility. This is rarely known ex ante; rather, assistants must predict it in order to optimally allocate limited user interactions. We instantiate this problem in image generation and derive a reinforcement learning framework using multi-turn simulated users to maximize utility recovery under uncertainty. In a preregistered study with 456 interactive sessions across 76 human participants, this helped users significantly better match reference images with significantly fewer questions, less total interaction time, and lower cost. This points toward a simple and scalable framework for training language model assistants to better disambiguate user intent by asking more informative questions.

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2610.04719 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2610.04719v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.04719 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 244 words

Related coverage