Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This paper tackles a practical problem in robot learning: when human demonstrations under-specify some task features, the robot can use its own uncertainty to target preference queries and explanations at those features, rather than asking the human to re-teach. The reported gains come from simulation (up to 30.8% better in the low-query regime) and a user study, so the evidence is promising but still early and domain-specific. For ML readers, the useful idea is that active preference learning can be made more query-efficient by informing the prior with where the model is uncertain.
Sources coveringarXiv, LessWrong
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Asking Smarter Questions: Targeted Active Preference Learning for Underspecified Rewards

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2610.22285v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reward learning typically assumes the human's input covers everything that matters for the task. In practice, humans can only attend to so much at once, so their teaching naturally captures some features---or aspects of the task---better than others. Prior work has shown how the robot can identify which features were poorly supervised directly from its teaching data. But the current solution is to ask the human to try again, putting the burden on someone who already struggled to convey those features. We propose shifting this burden to the robot. Our key insight is that the same information that tells the robot what it doesn't know can help it ask better questions. Preference queries offer a low-effort channel for resolving this uncertainty, but only if the robot knows where to direct them and the human knows what to attend to when answering. We act on this insight in two ways: we build an informed prior that targets preference queries at the features that need resolving, and we accompany each query with an explanation that focuses the human's attention on exactly those features. In simulation, the informed prior beats the standard active preference learning baseline by up to $30.8\%$ in the low-query regime, where reducing human effort matters most. In a user study, the informed prior and explanations each significantly improve reward recovery and amplify each other.

Abstract:Reward learning typically assumes the human's input covers everything that matters for the task. In practice, humans can only attend to so much at once, so their teaching naturally captures some features---or aspects of the task---better than others. Prior work has shown how the robot can identify which features were poorly supervised directly from its teaching data. But the current solution is to ask the human to try again, putting the burden on someone who already struggled to convey those features. We propose shifting this burden to the robot. Our key insight is that the same information that tells the robot what it doesn't know can help it ask better questions. Preference queries offer a low-effort channel for resolving this uncertainty, but only if the robot knows where to direct them and the human knows what to attend to when answering. We act on this insight in two ways: we build an informed prior that targets preference queries at the features that need resolving, and we accompany each query with an explanation that focuses the human's attention on exactly those features. In simulation, the informed prior beats the standard active preference learning baseline by up to $30.8\%$ in the low-query regime, where reducing human effort matters most. In a user study, the informed prior and explanations each significantly improve reward recovery and amplify each other.

Accepted to the 10th Conference on Robot Learning (CoRL 2026), Austin, TX. 18 pages, 8 figures, 1 table

Robotics (cs.RO); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2610.22285 [cs.RO]

(or arXiv:2610.22285v1 [cs.RO] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.22285 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 345 words

Related coverage