Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This study demonstrates that in multilingual pre-training, the order of language exposure significantly impacts model performance, with simultaneous mixed training outperforming staged curriculum approaches. Furthermore, it challenges the assumption that balanced data distribution is optimal, revealing that configurations dominated by a specific language (in this case, Dutch) can yield superior results depending on the task setting. These findings provide critical insights for optimizing limited-data pre-training strategies in low-resource multilingual environments.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Language Exposure Matters: Distribution and Order in Multilingual BabyLM Pre-training

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2610.20102v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We investigate two aspects of multilingual pre-training with limited data, namely how language exposure is distributed across English, Dutch, and Chinese, and how that exposure is ordered during training. In particular, we compare balanced multilingual exposure to language-dominant exposure, where one language is exposed with more training data than the others. We also compare mixed training, where multilingual training data is used throughout training, with curriculum training, where monolingual exposure of the dominant language is followed by balanced multilingual exposure. Our results show that multilingual BabyLM performance varies with both the amount and order of language exposure. Mixed training outperforms curriculum learning across all 15 matched configurations, indicating that simultaneous multilingual exposure is more effective than staged exposure in our setting. Several language-dominant mixed training configurations achieve higher scores than the balanced configuration, suggesting that a balanced distribution is not necessarily the highest-performing configuration in our setting. Interestingly, the Dutch-primary configurations achieve the best overall performance.

Abstract:We investigate two aspects of multilingual pre-training with limited data, namely how language exposure is distributed across English, Dutch, and Chinese, and how that exposure is ordered during training. In particular, we compare balanced multilingual exposure to language-dominant exposure, where one language is exposed with more training data than the others. We also compare mixed training, where multilingual training data is used throughout training, with curriculum training, where monolingual exposure of the dominant language is followed by balanced multilingual exposure. Our results show that multilingual BabyLM performance varies with both the amount and order of language exposure. Mixed training outperforms curriculum learning across all 15 matched configurations, indicating that simultaneous multilingual exposure is more effective than staged exposure in our setting. Several language-dominant mixed training configurations achieve higher scores than the balanced configuration, suggesting that a balanced distribution is not necessarily the highest-performing configuration in our setting. Interestingly, the Dutch-primary configurations achieve the best overall performance.

Computation and Language (cs.CL)

arXiv:2610.20102 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2610.20102v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.20102 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 251 words

Related coverage