analiza aiqbench
This study demonstrates that in multilingual pre-training, the order of language exposure significantly impacts model performance, with simultaneous mixed training outperforming staged curriculum approaches. Furthermore, it challenges the assumption that balanced data distribution is optimal, revealing that configurations dominated by a specific language (in this case, Dutch) can yield superior results depending on the task setting. These findings provide critical insights for optimizing limited-data pre-training strategies in low-resource multilingual environments.
Language Exposure Matters: Distribution and Order in Multilingual BabyLM Pre-training
arXiv:2610.20102v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We investigate two aspects of multilingual pre-training with limited data, namely how language exposure is distributed across English, Dutch, and Chinese, and how that exposure is ordered during training. In particular, we compare balanced multilingual exposure to language-dominant exposure, where one language is exposed with more training data than the others. We also compare mixed training, where multilingual training data is used throughout training, with curriculum training, where monolingual exposure of the dominant language is followed by balanced multilingual exposure. Our results show that multilingual BabyLM performance varies with both the amount and order of language exposure. Mixed training outperforms curriculum learning across all 15 matched configurations, indicating that simultaneous multilingual exposure is more effective than staged exposure in our setting. Several language-dominant mixed training configurations achieve higher scores than the balanced configuration, suggesting that a balanced distribution is not necessarily the highest-performing configuration in our setting. Interestingly, the Dutch-primary configurations achieve the best overall performance.
Abstract:We investigate two aspects of multilingual pre-training with limited data, namely how language exposure is distributed across English, Dutch, and Chinese, and how that exposure is ordered during training. In particular, we compare balanced multilingual exposure to language-dominant exposure, where one language is exposed with more training data than the others. We also compare mixed training, where multilingual training data is used throughout training, with curriculum training, where monolingual exposure of the dominant language is followed by balanced multilingual exposure. Our results show that multilingual BabyLM performance varies with both the amount and order of language exposure. Mixed training outperforms curriculum learning across all 15 matched configurations, indicating that simultaneous multilingual exposure is more effective than staged exposure in our setting. Several language-dominant mixed training configurations achieve higher scores than the balanced configuration, suggesting that a balanced distribution is not necessarily the highest-performing configuration in our setting. Interestingly, the Dutch-primary configurations achieve the best overall performance.
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2610.20102 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2610.20102v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.20102 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 251 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

[AINews] Meta Muse Wonder & Wonder Full: MSL’s Claude 5.5-tier Frontier Model
Latent Space · 13 oct. 2026
What's Continual Learning, and Why Might We Expect To See It In Advanced LLM Agents?
LessWrong · 12 iun. 2026

Granite 4.2 LLMs: How They're Built
Hugging Face · 25 aug. 2026

MedPAIR: Measuring Whether Physicians and AI Agree on What Matters in Medical QA
Snorkel AI Blog · 2 oct. 2026