aiqbench analysis
The Securities Association of China's draft code explicitly mandates that human professional judgment cannot be supplanted by AI outputs in sponsorship services, emphasizing strict data confidentiality and mandatory manual review of all generated content. This regulatory guidance highlights the critical need for robust human-in-the-loop verification mechanisms within high-stakes financial sectors where liability and accuracy are paramount.
SAC: Sponsors Must Not Replace Professional Judgment with AI Tools
The Securities Association of China (SAC) has drafted the 'Code of Conduct for Practicing Sponsor Representatives (Draft for Comments)' (hereinafter referred to as the 'Draft') and is now soliciting industry feedback. The Draft stipulates that when sponsor representatives and other personnel engaged in sponsorship business use AI tools during their practice, they must strictly fulfill data confidentiality obligations, strengthen manual review of outputs from AI tools, and must not replace their own due diligence, prudent verification, and professional judgment with the outputs of AI tools. (Securities Times)
Read the full article at 36KrRelated coverage
AI reshapes professional services around trust and business outcomes
SiliconANGLE · Oct 10, 2026
The Continual Constitutional Convention: How language models revise the documents that govern them
AI Alignment Forum · Oct 13, 2026
Hands-free first notice of loss: Using Strands Agents and Amazon Bedrock AgentCore Browser Tool for intelligent claims intake
AWS · Jun 9, 2026
It’s about ethics in journalism, with Ben Smith
The Verge · Aug 17, 2026