perspectiva aiqbenchPolitici AI

The Securities Association of China's draft code explicitly mandates that human professional judgment cannot be supplanted by AI outputs in sponsorship services, emphasizing strict data confidentiality and mandatory manual review of all generated content. This regulatory guidance highlights the critical need for robust human-in-the-loop verification mechanisms within high-stakes financial sectors where liability and accuracy are paramount.

Sursă care acoperă36Kr

Ce este aceastaLectura unui model asupra articolului și a acoperirii conexe, scrisă pentru aiqbench. Nu sunt cuvintele publicației.

SAC: Sponsors Must Not Replace Professional Judgment with AI Tools

36Kr9 octombrie 20261 min de cititArticolul și perspectiva sunt în engleză.

The Securities Association of China (SAC) has drafted the 'Code of Conduct for Practicing Sponsor Representatives (Draft for Comments)' (hereinafter referred to as the 'Draft') and is now soliciting industry feedback. The Draft stipulates that when sponsor representatives and other personnel engaged in sponsorship business use AI tools during their practice, they must strictly fulfill data confidentiality obligations, strengthen manual review of outputs from AI tools, and must not replace their own due diligence, prudent verification, and professional judgment with the outputs of AI tools. (Securities Times)

Citește articolul complet pe 36Kr

Citește pe 36Kr ↗Întreabă despre acest articol