aiqbench analysis
This arXiv preprint introduces a benchmark for AI agents on equity research, built with a timestamped financial database so models can't see post-decision information. The headline result is that strong overall research scores don't carry over to forecasting: the top model reaches 68.1 overall but only 52.5 on Forecast & Model. For readers, the useful takeaway is the evaluation design, which traces claims back to sources, calculations, and assumptions, and the gap it exposes. The results are self-reported and not yet peer reviewed.
Investor's Last Exam: Can AI Agents Do Equity Investment Without Seeing the Future?
arXiv:2610.38342v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Financial agents must form forecasts and investment judgments from decision-time evidence, with predictions evaluated against subsequent outcomes. Existing benchmarks assess financial knowledge, research workflows, or forecasting, but evaluating the full research process requires a strictly frozen information set and professional evaluation criteria. We introduce Investor's Last Exam (ILE), an equity-research benchmark led by experienced buy-side investors and fund managers. Its three components are a versioned financial database spanning 3.43 million document versions and nine source categories, supplemented by structured market data, with validated timestamps governing retrieval and computation; a task taxonomy organized around professional analyst deliverables; and an expert-led framework linking scoring criteria to sources, calculations, and assumptions through financial dependency graphs. Evaluation spans 86 assignments and jointly assesses research quality, forecast accuracy, and simulated investment performance. GPT-6 Astra and Claude Opus 5.5 lead overall at 68.1 and 66.9 out of 100, yet even Astra scores only 52.5 on Forecast & Model. Our results show that even state-of-the-art models fail to translate overall research capability into predictive performance. ILE shifts the evaluation unit from isolated capabilities to the evidence--assumption--judgment chain, allowing researchers to locate where analytical advantages fail to translate into forecasts and investment judgments, and providing a traceable, diagnostic foundation for training and evaluating financial agents.
Title:Investor's Last Exam: Can AI Agents Do Equity Investment Without Seeing the Future?
Abstract:Financial agents must form forecasts and investment judgments from decision-time evidence, with predictions evaluated against subsequent outcomes. Existing benchmarks assess financial knowledge, research workflows, or forecasting, but evaluating the full research process requires a strictly frozen information set and professional evaluation criteria. We introduce Investor's Last Exam (ILE), an equity-research benchmark led by experienced buy-side investors and fund managers. Its three components are a versioned financial database spanning 3.43 million document versions and nine source categories, supplemented by structured market data, with validated timestamps governing retrieval and computation; a task taxonomy organized around professional analyst deliverables; and an expert-led framework linking scoring criteria to sources, calculations, and assumptions through financial dependency graphs. Evaluation spans 86 assignments and jointly assesses research quality, forecast accuracy, and simulated investment performance. GPT-6 Astra and Claude Opus 5.5 lead overall at 68.1 and 66.9 out of 100, yet even Astra scores only 52.5 on Forecast & Model. Our results show that even state-of-the-art models fail to translate overall research capability into predictive performance. ILE shifts the evaluation unit from isolated capabilities to the evidence--assumption--judgment chain, allowing researchers to locate where analytical advantages fail to translate into forecasts and investment judgments, and providing a traceable, diagnostic foundation for training and evaluating financial agents.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2610.38342 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2610.38342v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.38342 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 314 words
Related coverage

Forbes Asia 100 To Watch 2026
forbes.com · Aug 24, 2026
Investors Shoot for the Moon - Motley Fool Hidden Gems Investing Podcast
fool.com · Oct 19, 2026
Why the Companies Most at Risk of Disruption Are Usually the Most Successful Ones - Motley Fool Hidden Gems Investing Podcast
fool.com · Oct 18, 2026
NDRC Issues Measures on Outbound Investment Management
36Kr · Oct 22, 2026