aiqbench analysis
This paper introduces IB-Forecast, a novel framework that integrates information bottleneck principles into time-series forecasting to ensure explanations faithfully reflect the data driving predictions. By decomposing forecasts into periodic and residual components with explainable masks, it achieves native interpretability without incurring additional inference costs or sacrificing accuracy compared to leading black-box models. The approach effectively bridges the gap between high-performance prediction systems and rigorous faithfulness guarantees previously limited to post-hoc classification tasks.
Information Bottleneck Learning for Faithful Time Series Forecasting Explanations
arXiv:2607.28124v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As forecasts increasingly drive decisions in fields such as energy, transportation, and healthcare, understanding the historical data behind these predictions has become as crucial as the predictions themselves. Although existing interpretable-by-design forecasters reveal their internal structures, they offer no guarantee that these structures faithfully reflect the underlying evidence driving the predictions. In contrast, while faithfulness-oriented methods explicitly verify model behavior, they are almost exclusively designed for post-hoc classification tasks. To bridge this gap, we propose IB-Forecast, an inherently interpretable multivariate time-series forecasting framework. It decomposes forecasting into a learned periodic component and a residual component computed with explainable masks over input tokens. With a budget-constrained information bottleneck, end-to-end optimization enables users to directly control explanation sparsity. With a rigorous faithfulness evaluation protocol, extensive experiments demonstrate that IB-Forecast matches the forecasting error of leading black-box models while providing faithful explanations at no additional inference cost. Furthermore, under a matched sparsity budget, these native explanations consistently surpass gradient-based, occlusion-based, and optimization-based baselines across all evaluated datasets. Ultimately, whereas the native explanations of existing interpretable forecasters exhibit poor faithfulness, IB-Forecast guarantees high explanation fidelity, requiring only 14-20% of the observations to deliver low-error predictions.
Abstract:As forecasts increasingly drive decisions in fields such as energy, transportation, and healthcare, understanding the historical data behind these predictions has become as crucial as the predictions themselves. Although existing interpretable-by-design forecasters reveal their internal structures, they offer no guarantee that these structures faithfully reflect the underlying evidence driving the predictions. In contrast, while faithfulness-oriented methods explicitly verify model behavior, they are almost exclusively designed for post-hoc classification tasks. To bridge this gap, we propose IB-Forecast, an inherently interpretable multivariate time-series forecasting framework. It decomposes forecasting into a learned periodic component and a residual component computed with explainable masks over input tokens. With a budget-constrained information bottleneck, end-to-end optimization enables users to directly control explanation sparsity. With a rigorous faithfulness evaluation protocol, extensive experiments demonstrate that IB-Forecast matches the forecasting error of leading black-box models while providing faithful explanations at no additional inference cost. Furthermore, under a matched sparsity budget, these native explanations consistently surpass gradient-based, occlusion-based, and optimization-based baselines across all evaluated datasets. Ultimately, whereas the native explanations of existing interpretable forecasters exhibit poor faithfulness, IB-Forecast guarantees high explanation fidelity, requiring only 14-20% of the observations to deliver low-error predictions.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2607.28124 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2607.28124v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.28124 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 288 words
Related coverage
Towards A Unified Information Bottleneck Framework for Time Series Explanations
arXiv · Aug 27, 2026
Latent reasoning architectures would likely undermine CoT, our strongest oversight tool
AI Alignment Forum · Sep 23, 2026
The current bottleneck is political will, not research
AI Alignment Forum · Jul 11, 2026
NVExplain: Explaining Time Series Forecasting with Latent Trajectory Analysis and Structure-Preserving Surrogates
arXiv · Aug 27, 2026