Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This research establishes tighter theoretical lower bounds for gradient descent convergence in smooth convex optimization, refining our understanding of the limits of acceleration via predetermined stepsizes. By improving upon recent non-anytime and anytime bounds, the study clarifies the fundamental separation between these two optimization settings without relying on adaptive schedules. These findings are critical for researchers developing provably efficient algorithms where theoretical convergence rates directly impact practical performance guarantees.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Improved Gradient Descent Lower Bounds Beyond Nesterov

arXiv1 min read

arXiv:2609.02855v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We study how far gradient descent (GD) can be accelerated by predetermined stepsizes in smooth convex optimization. Going beyond the classical $\Omega(n^{-2})$ first-order oracle lower bound of Nemirovsky and Yudin, we prove an $\Omega(n^{-1.6342})$ non-anytime lower bound and an $\Omega(n^{-1.2408})$ anytime lower bound. These improve the recent $\Omega(n^{-1.932})$ non-anytime lower bound of Ma and Chen and the $\Omega(n^{-4/3})$ anytime lower bound of Tsai et al., respectively. Together with the non-anytime $O(n^{-\log_2(1+\sqrt{2})})$ rate achieved by silver schedules, our anytime lower bound establishes a strict separation between the achievable convergence exponents in the two settings.

Abstract:We study how far gradient descent (GD) can be accelerated by predetermined stepsizes in smooth convex optimization. Going beyond the classical $\Omega(n^{-2})$ first-order oracle lower bound of Nemirovsky and Yudin, we prove an $\Omega(n^{-1.6342})$ non-anytime lower bound and an $\Omega(n^{-1.2408})$ anytime lower bound. These improve the recent $\Omega(n^{-1.932})$ non-anytime lower bound of Ma and Chen and the $\Omega(n^{-4/3})$ anytime lower bound of Tsai et al., respectively. Together with the non-anytime $O(n^{-\log_2(1+\sqrt{2})})$ rate achieved by silver schedules, our anytime lower bound establishes a strict separation between the achievable convergence exponents in the two settings.

Optimization and Control (math.OC); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Machine Learning (stat.ML)

arXiv:2609.02855 [math.OC]

(or arXiv:2609.02855v1 [math.OC] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.02855 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 194 words

Related coverage