analiza aiqbench
This research establishes tighter theoretical lower bounds for gradient descent convergence in smooth convex optimization, refining our understanding of the limits of acceleration via predetermined stepsizes. By improving upon recent non-anytime and anytime bounds, the study clarifies the fundamental separation between these two optimization settings without relying on adaptive schedules. These findings are critical for researchers developing provably efficient algorithms where theoretical convergence rates directly impact practical performance guarantees.
Improved Gradient Descent Lower Bounds Beyond Nesterov
arXiv:2609.02855v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We study how far gradient descent (GD) can be accelerated by predetermined stepsizes in smooth convex optimization. Going beyond the classical $\Omega(n^{-2})$ first-order oracle lower bound of Nemirovsky and Yudin, we prove an $\Omega(n^{-1.6342})$ non-anytime lower bound and an $\Omega(n^{-1.2408})$ anytime lower bound. These improve the recent $\Omega(n^{-1.932})$ non-anytime lower bound of Ma and Chen and the $\Omega(n^{-4/3})$ anytime lower bound of Tsai et al., respectively. Together with the non-anytime $O(n^{-\log_2(1+\sqrt{2})})$ rate achieved by silver schedules, our anytime lower bound establishes a strict separation between the achievable convergence exponents in the two settings.
Abstract:We study how far gradient descent (GD) can be accelerated by predetermined stepsizes in smooth convex optimization. Going beyond the classical $\Omega(n^{-2})$ first-order oracle lower bound of Nemirovsky and Yudin, we prove an $\Omega(n^{-1.6342})$ non-anytime lower bound and an $\Omega(n^{-1.2408})$ anytime lower bound. These improve the recent $\Omega(n^{-1.932})$ non-anytime lower bound of Ma and Chen and the $\Omega(n^{-4/3})$ anytime lower bound of Tsai et al., respectively. Together with the non-anytime $O(n^{-\log_2(1+\sqrt{2})})$ rate achieved by silver schedules, our anytime lower bound establishes a strict separation between the achievable convergence exponents in the two settings.
Optimization and Control (math.OC); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Machine Learning (stat.ML)
arXiv:2609.02855 [math.OC]
(or arXiv:2609.02855v1 [math.OC] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.02855 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 194 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe

[AINews] Reality Checks on AI News (Yegge shuts down Gas Town, Databricks’ +60% Astra cost)
Latent Space · 17 sept. 2026
Unifying Learning Dynamics and Generalization in Transformers Scaling Law
arXiv · 12 iun. 2026
Optimal Hidden-Target Learning for Online Inventory Optimization on General Convex Sets
arXiv · 15 iun. 2026

When Partial Credit Opposes Completion
Snorkel AI Blog · 15 oct. 2026