aiqbench analysis
This study clarifies the gap between human intuition and Large Vision-Language Model (LVLM) behavior by demonstrating that models require explicit instructions to optimize referring expressions, rather than inferring communicative efficiency implicitly like humans do. The findings isolate prompting style as a key variable in resolving contradictory results from recent literature on AI coordination tasks.
Implicit vs. Explicit Prompting Strategies for LVLMs in Referential Communication
arXiv:2606.17372v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Two recent studies (Jones et al. (2026); Zeng et al. (2026)) reach apparently contradictory conclusions about whether LVLMs can coordinate on efficient referring expressions. We control for task differences between the studies while directly comparing their prompting styles. We replicate the finding that models can coordinate efficient referring expressions when explicitly prompted to do so, suggesting that other task differences are not responsible for divergent results. However, we also find that the same models fail to infer the need for communicative efficiency from a more implicit prompt, highlighting critical differences between how humans and AI systems communicate.
Title:Implicit vs. Explicit Prompting Strategies for LVLMs in Referential Communication
Abstract:Two recent studies (Jones et al. (2026); Zeng et al. (2026)) reach apparently contradictory conclusions about whether LVLMs can coordinate on efficient referring expressions. We control for task differences between the studies while directly comparing their prompting styles. We replicate the finding that models can coordinate efficient referring expressions when explicitly prompted to do so, suggesting that other task differences are not responsible for divergent results. However, we also find that the same models fail to infer the need for communicative efficiency from a more implicit prompt, highlighting critical differences between how humans and AI systems communicate.
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2606.17372 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2606.17372v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.17372 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 205 words
Related coverage
Implicit vs. Explicit Prompting Strategies for LVLMs in Referential Communication
arXiv · Sep 3, 2026
The current bottleneck is political will, not research
AI Alignment Forum · Jul 11, 2026

Academia is for Ambition — Alex Zhang, MIT
Latent Space · Oct 2, 2026

Game Design Creativity evals
LessWrong · Oct 12, 2026