Sari la conținut

Română · beta. Traducerea a fost făcută automat și este încă în curs de revizuire. Citește pagina în engleză

perspectiva aiqbenchMachine learning

analiza aiqbench

This study clarifies the gap between human intuition and Large Vision-Language Model (LVLM) behavior by demonstrating that models require explicit instructions to optimize referring expressions, rather than inferring communicative efficiency implicitly like humans do. The findings isolate prompting style as a key variable in resolving contradictory results from recent literature on AI coordination tasks.
Sursă care acoperăarXiv
Ce este aceastaLectura unui model asupra articolului și a acoperirii conexe, scrisă pentru aiqbench. Nu sunt cuvintele publicației.

Implicit vs. Explicit Prompting Strategies for LVLMs in Referential Communication

arXiv2 min de cititArticolul și perspectiva sunt în engleză.

arXiv:2606.17372v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Two recent studies (Jones et al. (2026); Zeng et al. (2026)) reach apparently contradictory conclusions about whether LVLMs can coordinate on efficient referring expressions. We control for task differences between the studies while directly comparing their prompting styles. We replicate the finding that models can coordinate efficient referring expressions when explicitly prompted to do so, suggesting that other task differences are not responsible for divergent results. However, we also find that the same models fail to infer the need for communicative efficiency from a more implicit prompt, highlighting critical differences between how humans and AI systems communicate.

Title:Implicit vs. Explicit Prompting Strategies for LVLMs in Referential Communication

Abstract:Two recent studies (Jones et al. (2026); Zeng et al. (2026)) reach apparently contradictory conclusions about whether LVLMs can coordinate on efficient referring expressions. We control for task differences between the studies while directly comparing their prompting styles. We replicate the finding that models can coordinate efficient referring expressions when explicitly prompted to do so, suggesting that other task differences are not responsible for divergent results. However, we also find that the same models fail to infer the need for communicative efficiency from a more implicit prompt, highlighting critical differences between how humans and AI systems communicate.

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2606.17372 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2606.17372v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.17372 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 205 cuvinte

Subiecte conexe