aiqbench analysis
This research identifies a non-Hermitian mechanism where an imaginary potential barrier induces dynamical tunnelling, leading to state equilibration rather than periodic oscillation in symmetric potentials. The study validates this phenomenon analytically using minimal matrix models and proposes specific optical waveguide architectures for experimental verification.
Imaginary Barrier, Real Transfer: Non-Hermitian Dynamical Tunnelling
arXiv:2608.16545v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We identify a non-Hermitian counterpart of dynamical tunnelling induced by a localised absorbing region in a symmetric confining potential. The absorbing region, described by an imaginary potential barrier, induces an effective double-well structure with a pair of long-lived states that have little population in the barrier. In contrast to the periodic tunnel oscillations through a real barrier, the system slowly evolves towards equal population of the two sides, while the absorbing region remains only weakly populated. We demonstrate this generic mechanism in two continuous potentials, and capture its essence analytically in a minimal $3\times 3$ matrix model. We propose a realistic optical waveguide setup for the experimental observation of the effect.
Abstract:We identify a non-Hermitian counterpart of dynamical tunnelling induced by a localised absorbing region in a symmetric confining potential. The absorbing region, described by an imaginary potential barrier, induces an effective double-well structure with a pair of long-lived states that have little population in the barrier. In contrast to the periodic tunnel oscillations through a real barrier, the system slowly evolves towards equal population of the two sides, while the absorbing region remains only weakly populated. We demonstrate this generic mechanism in two continuous potentials, and capture its essence analytically in a minimal $3\times 3$ matrix model. We propose a realistic optical waveguide setup for the experimental observation of the effect.
Quantum Physics (quant-ph); Mathematical Physics (math-ph); Optics (physics.optics)
arXiv:2608.16545 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2608.16545v1 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.16545 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 210 words
Related coverage
Complex-Time Parametrization of Evanescent Tunneling and Transmission Delay in non-Hermitian Scattering
arXiv · Aug 25, 2026

Is The Brain A Quantum Computer? The Decoherence Numbers Say No
Quantum Zeitgeist · Sep 13, 2026

University of Illinois & Birmingham Build Active Gauge Field
Quantum Zeitgeist · Aug 29, 2026
Interior skin focusing and directional mirror transfer in a graded non-Hermitian Krawtchouk network
arXiv · Aug 20, 2026