Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This study empirically characterizes how decoder-only transformers geometrically reject incorrect factual continuations through a two-phase process of rotational divergence followed by late-layer asymmetric commitment. The findings reveal that this rejection mechanism is distributed across many layers rather than localized to a single circuit, challenging simple recall accounts while noting potential tokenizer artifacts in smaller models. For researchers, this provides a concrete geometric signature of constraint processing that is consistent across diverse architecture families from 1B to 13B parameters.
Sources coveringarXiv, Quantum Zeitgeist

How Transformers Reject Wrong Answers: Rotational Dynamics of Factual Constraint Processing

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2603.13259v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: When a decoder-only transformer is forced to process matched correct and incorrect single-token continuations of a factual query, the two pathways through hidden-state space diverge in a specific way: displacement vectors from the query-only representation maintain approximately equal magnitude but rotate apart in direction. The angular separation grows through mid-depth, and late layers resolve the asymmetric outcome -a logit-lens preference that, in the incorrect run, falls far below the naive prior of equal probability, corresponding to the model assigning approximately 11.5 times more probability to the incorrect token than to the correct one. We characterize this two-phase pattern-rotational divergence in mid-depth followed by late-layer asymmetric commitment-as the empirical geometric signature of what looks externally like the model rejecting a wrong continuation, while remaining explicit that it is an observational characterization, not a causal account. The pattern is consistent across six decoder-only transformers including five architecture families from 1B to 13B parameters. A seventh model (Qwen2 1.5B) shows a flat profile under the present extraction protocol that is plausibly a tokenizer-fragmentation artefact rather than a real scale floor; the question of an emergence threshold is left open. Single-layer activation patching does not recover the correct token at any layer band, meaning the late-layer asymmetry is not localized to a discrete component under the protocol used. Taken together, the evidence is consistent with a distributed-by-trajectory account of factual constraint processing-geometric structure that emerges cumulatively across many layers rather than from a single localized circuit and inconsistent with the simplest single-layer localized-recall account.

Abstract:When a decoder-only transformer is forced to process matched correct and incorrect single-token continuations of a factual query, the two pathways through hidden-state space diverge in a specific way: displacement vectors from the query-only representation maintain approximately equal magnitude but rotate apart in direction. The angular separation grows through mid-depth, and late layers resolve the asymmetric outcome -a logit-lens preference that, in the incorrect run, falls far below the naive prior of equal probability, corresponding to the model assigning approximately 11.5 times more probability to the incorrect token than to the correct one. We characterize this two-phase pattern-rotational divergence in mid-depth followed by late-layer asymmetric commitment-as the empirical geometric signature of what looks externally like the model rejecting a wrong continuation, while remaining explicit that it is an observational characterization, not a causal account. The pattern is consistent across six decoder-only transformers including five architecture families from 1B to 13B parameters. A seventh model (Qwen2 1.5B) shows a flat profile under the present extraction protocol that is plausibly a tokenizer-fragmentation artefact rather than a real scale floor; the question of an emergence threshold is left open. Single-layer activation patching does not recover the correct token at any layer band, meaning the late-layer asymmetry is not localized to a discrete component under the protocol used. Taken together, the evidence is consistent with a distributed-by-trajectory account of factual constraint processing-geometric structure that emerges cumulatively across many layers rather than from a single localized circuit and inconsistent with the simplest single-layer localized-recall account.

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2603.13259 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2603.13259v2 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.13259 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 346 words

Related coverage