aiqbench analysis
This study benchmarks seven open-source neural audio codecs against African speech datasets, revealing significant gaps between standard perceptual metrics and actual performance in downstream tasks like ASR and speaker verification. The research demonstrates that domain-specific adaptation using parameter-efficient methods can substantially recover recognition accuracy degraded by compression on accented or multilingual inputs. These findings are critical for developing robust, inclusive audio tokenization systems required for global AI deployment.
How Robust Are Neural Audio Codecs for African Speech? A Multi-Task Benchmark and the Limits of Perceptual Quality
arXiv:2610.00154v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Neural audio codecs enable low-bitrate speech compression and tokenization, yet their robustness on accented and multilingual speech remains under-evaluated. We benchmark seven open-source neural codecs (DAC, EnCodec, FocalCodec, LanguageCodec, SemantiCodec, UniCodec, WavTokenizer) on three African speech datasets afrinames, afrispeech dialog, afrispeech multilingual, reporting signal-level quality (NISQA, UTMOS, ViSQOL, STOI, F0-RMSE) alongside two downstream tasks: automatic speech recognition (ASR) and speaker verification (ASV). Our analysis yields four findings. First, signal metrics differ sharply in downstream validity: reference-based structural/intelligibility measures (ViSQOL, STOI) and prosodic error (F0-RMSE) track ASR and ASV degradation far more reliably than neural mean-opinion-score predictors (NISQA, UTMOS). Second, intelligibility and speaker-identity preservation diverge sharply across architectures, and the apparent identity ranking itself depends on the ASV backend. Third, degradation is strongly domain-dependent and largest for conversational dialog. Fourth, the resulting degradation is partly recoverable: parameter-efficient \emph{codec} adaptation (LoRA, $\sim$1--3\% of parameters) on roughly 35 hours of African speech reduces the compression-induced word-error-rate gap, recovering recognition toward the uncompressed baseline (developed in companion work). These results motivate task-aware, domain-representative, and adaptation-aware evaluation of speech codecs as a prerequisite for inclusive deployment.
Title:How Robust Are Neural Audio Codecs for African Speech? A Multi-Task Benchmark and the Limits of Perceptual Quality
Abstract:Neural audio codecs enable low-bitrate speech compression and tokenization, yet their robustness on accented and multilingual speech remains under-evaluated. We benchmark seven open-source neural codecs (DAC, EnCodec, FocalCodec, LanguageCodec, SemantiCodec, UniCodec, WavTokenizer) on three African speech datasets afrinames, afrispeech dialog, afrispeech multilingual, reporting signal-level quality (NISQA, UTMOS, ViSQOL, STOI, F0-RMSE) alongside two downstream tasks: automatic speech recognition (ASR) and speaker verification (ASV). Our analysis yields four findings. First, signal metrics differ sharply in downstream validity: reference-based structural/intelligibility measures (ViSQOL, STOI) and prosodic error (F0-RMSE) track ASR and ASV degradation far more reliably than neural mean-opinion-score predictors (NISQA, UTMOS). Second, intelligibility and speaker-identity preservation diverge sharply across architectures, and the apparent identity ranking itself depends on the ASV backend. Third, degradation is strongly domain-dependent and largest for conversational dialog. Fourth, the resulting degradation is partly recoverable: parameter-efficient \emph{codec} adaptation (LoRA, $\sim$1--3\% of parameters) on roughly 35 hours of African speech reduces the compression-induced word-error-rate gap, recovering recognition toward the uncompressed baseline (developed in companion work). These results motivate task-aware, domain-representative, and adaptation-aware evaluation of speech codecs as a prerequisite for inclusive deployment.
Sound (cs.SD); Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2610.00154 [cs.SD]
(or arXiv:2610.00154v1 [cs.SD] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.00154 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 296 words
Related coverage
CleanCodec: Efficient and Robust Speech Tokenization via Perceptually Guided Encoding
arXiv · Jun 4, 2026
Teffic-Audio: Tell Fact from Fiction
arXiv · Aug 17, 2026
UniPASE: A Generative Model for Universal Speech Enhancement with High Fidelity and Low Hallucinations
arXiv · Aug 5, 2026
LACE: Layer-Wise Compression for Dynamic Frame Rate Codecs
arXiv · Sep 16, 2026