aiqbench analysis
This is a user study of a bandit-driven dialog system that chooses how different an alternative viewpoint should be from the user's own, comparing a scalar stance score against concept-level stance vectors (N=63). The concept-level encoder widens exposure and topic coverage but does not change how deeply users justify or reconstruct viewpoints. The useful takeaway for AI readers is that viewpoint selection may need to target which specific concepts users disagree on, not just overall distance, though the sample is small and the results are from a single study.
How Different, or Different How? Stance Granularity in Viewpoint Selection for Dialog Systems that Engage Users with Alternative Views
arXiv:2610.31459v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Systems that aim to help a user engage with viewpoints other than their own have to decide how different those viewpoints should be. Viewpoints are mainly represented on a scalar scale, too coarse to distinguish viewpoints that disagree with the user about different things. We introduce a selection policy in which a bandit sets how far viewpoints may sit from the user, and the policy selects the most novel viewpoint within that bound. We vary only its stance encoder, comparing a scalar score with Perspectivized Stance Vectors, which break a position into separate stances on concepts. We integrate it inside a dialog system and run a between-subjects study (N=63). Concept-level stance produces more varied exposure sequences and broader coverage of the topic's positions, but does not change how deeply users justify viewpoints or how accurately they reconstruct them. Finally, we analyze user--viewpoint relations at the concept level, showing that users reconstruct a viewpoint least accurately on concepts that one side took no position on, rather than on concepts where the two disagreed. Our findings open up opportunities for dialog systems that support engagement with alternative viewpoints by acting on which concepts a user and a viewpoint disagree on, rather than on distance alone.
Title:How Different, or Different How? Stance Granularity in Viewpoint Selection for Dialog Systems that Engage Users with Alternative Views
Abstract:Systems that aim to help a user engage with viewpoints other than their own have to decide how different those viewpoints should be. Viewpoints are mainly represented on a scalar scale, too coarse to distinguish viewpoints that disagree with the user about different things. We introduce a selection policy in which a bandit sets how far viewpoints may sit from the user, and the policy selects the most novel viewpoint within that bound. We vary only its stance encoder, comparing a scalar score with Perspectivized Stance Vectors, which break a position into separate stances on concepts. We integrate it inside a dialog system and run a between-subjects study (N=63). Concept-level stance produces more varied exposure sequences and broader coverage of the topic's positions, but does not change how deeply users justify viewpoints or how accurately they reconstruct them. Finally, we analyze user--viewpoint relations at the concept level, showing that users reconstruct a viewpoint least accurately on concepts that one side took no position on, rather than on concepts where the two disagreed. Our findings open up opportunities for dialog systems that support engagement with alternative viewpoints by acting on which concepts a user and a viewpoint disagree on, rather than on distance alone.
Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC); Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2610.31459 [cs.HC]
(or arXiv:2610.31459v1 [cs.HC] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.31459 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 320 words
Related coverage
Sensitive dependence of the motion of a legged robot on granular media
arXiv · Oct 23, 2026
DK-GBMKKM: Dynamic Kernel-Space Granular-Ball Multiple Kernel $k$-Means Clustering
arXiv · Sep 2, 2026
TRACE: Spatiotemporal Contact Memory Graph Network Simulator for Granular Dynamics
arXiv · Sep 4, 2026
MDL-GBG: A Non-parametric and Interpretable Granular-Ball Generation Method for Clustering
arXiv · Jul 31, 2026