aiqbench takeAI Products

Grok 4.7 demonstrates improved efficiency on Senior SWE-Bench, achieving a tasteful pass@3 of 40.0% at roughly one-third the cost of competing frontier models like Opus 4.8. This performance highlights the growing viability of specific coding agents for complex software engineering tasks where cost-per-trial is a critical operational metric. The benchmark's focus on real-world pull requests and code quality further validates these results as meaningful indicators of practical engineering capability rather than synthetic benchmarks.

Source coveringSnorkel AI Blog

What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Grok 4.7 on Senior SWE-Bench: Strong pass@3, Cheaper Cost per Trial

Snorkel AI BlogSeptember 22, 20263 min read

Grok 4.7 was evaluated on Senior SWE-Bench, our benchmark for measuring whether coding agents work like senior engineers. It reaches a tasteful pass@3 of 40.0%, up from 38.9% for Grok 4.6, ranking sixth overall at $0.24 per trial, which is a fraction of the cost compared to Opus 4.8. Benchmark Senior SWE-Bench evaluates agents as compared to a senior engineer.... The post Grok 4.7 on Senior SWE-Bench: Strong pass@3, Cheaper Cost per Trial appeared first on Snorkel AI.

Grok 4.7 was evaluated on Senior SWE-Bench, our benchmark for measuring whether coding agents work like senior engineers. It reaches a tasteful pass@3 of 40.0%, up from 38.9% for Grok 4.6, ranking sixth overall at $0.24 per trial, which is a fraction of the cost compared to Opus 4.8. Senior SWE-Bench evaluates agents as compared to a…

Excerpt shown under the publisher's RSS terms · 57 words · full text and figures are on the publisher's site

Read at Snorkel AI Blog ↗Ask about this article