Sari la conținut

Română · beta. Traducerea a fost făcută automat și este încă în curs de revizuire. Citește pagina în engleză

perspectiva aiqbenchProduse AI

analiza aiqbench

Grok 4.7 demonstrates improved efficiency on Senior SWE-Bench, achieving a tasteful pass@3 of 40.0% at roughly one-third the cost of competing frontier models like Opus 4.8. This performance highlights the growing viability of specific coding agents for complex software engineering tasks where cost-per-trial is a critical operational metric. The benchmark's focus on real-world pull requests and code quality further validates these results as meaningful indicators of practical engineering capability rather than synthetic benchmarks.
Sursă care acoperăSnorkel AI Blog
Ce este aceastaLectura unui model asupra articolului și a acoperirii conexe, scrisă pentru aiqbench. Nu sunt cuvintele publicației.

Grok 4.7 on Senior SWE-Bench: Strong pass@3, Cheaper Cost per Trial

Snorkel AI Blog3 min de cititArticolul și perspectiva sunt în engleză.

Grok 4.7 was evaluated on Senior SWE-Bench, our benchmark for measuring whether coding agents work like senior engineers. It reaches a tasteful pass@3 of 40.0%, up from 38.9% for Grok 4.6, ranking sixth overall at $0.24 per trial, which is a fraction of the cost compared to Opus 4.8. Benchmark Senior SWE-Bench evaluates agents as compared to a senior engineer.... The post Grok 4.7 on Senior SWE-Bench: Strong pass@3, Cheaper Cost per Trial appeared first on Snorkel AI.

Grok 4.7 was evaluated on Senior SWE-Bench, our benchmark for measuring whether coding agents work like senior engineers. It reaches a tasteful pass@3 of 40.0%, up from 38.9% for Grok 4.6, ranking sixth overall at $0.24 per trial, which is a fraction of the cost compared to Opus 4.8. Senior SWE-Bench evaluates agents as compared to a…

Extras afișat conform termenilor RSS ai publicației · 57 cuvinte · textul integral și figurile sunt pe site-ul publicației

Subiecte conexe