Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

GRASP introduces a novel geometric penalty to model subset interactions in data attribution, overcoming the limitations of isolated utility scoring in large-scale pretraining. By coupling feature sketches with finite lower-confidence bounds, this method significantly improves counterfactual fidelity while reducing computational overhead for massive corpora. The approach offers a robust framework for optimizing training data selection across both language and vision models.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

GRASP: Geometry-aware Residual Alignment for Scalable Pretraining Data Attribution

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2606.06892v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Scalable data attribution methods typically assign isolated utility scores to individual training examples. This prevalent additive assumption fundamentally fails to capture critical subset dynamics, including data redundancy and complementary coverage. In this work, we reframe attribution as subset-level counterfactual utility prediction and introduce GRASP, an interaction-aware surrogate. Grounded in a theoretical smoothness lower bound, GRASP explicitly models subset interactions through a quadratic geometric penalty. To achieve pretraining-scale efficiency without relying on hidden oracle tuning, we couple low-dimensional feature sketches with a strictly finite lower-confidence bound selection protocol. Extensive subset-retraining evaluations demonstrate that GRASP decisively outperforms existing scalable baselines. It more than doubles the task-level rank correlation for counterfactual subset fidelity while reducing upfront artifact construction costs by nearly an order of magnitude. Downstream diagnostics further show that this scoring mechanism transfers to language model curation and cross-domain vision selection, establishing a robust foundation for optimizing massive pretraining corpora.

Abstract:Scalable data attribution methods typically assign isolated utility scores to individual training examples. This prevalent additive assumption fundamentally fails to capture critical subset dynamics, including data redundancy and complementary coverage. In this work, we reframe attribution as subset-level counterfactual utility prediction and introduce GRASP, an interaction-aware surrogate. Grounded in a theoretical smoothness lower bound, GRASP explicitly models subset interactions through a quadratic geometric penalty. To achieve pretraining-scale efficiency without relying on hidden oracle tuning, we couple low-dimensional feature sketches with a strictly finite lower-confidence bound selection protocol. Extensive subset-retraining evaluations demonstrate that GRASP decisively outperforms existing scalable baselines. It more than doubles the task-level rank correlation for counterfactual subset fidelity while reducing upfront artifact construction costs by nearly an order of magnitude. Downstream diagnostics further show that this scoring mechanism transfers to language model curation and cross-domain vision selection, establishing a robust foundation for optimizing massive pretraining corpora.

Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2606.06892 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2606.06892v2 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.06892 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 240 words

Related coverage