aiqbench analysis
GRASP addresses a critical flaw in current data attribution methods by shifting from isolated sample scoring to subset-level counterfactual utility prediction, effectively capturing data redundancy and complementarity. By leveraging low-dimensional feature sketches and a geometric penalty, the approach achieves pretraining-scale efficiency that doubles task-level rank correlation while reducing artifact construction costs by nearly an order of magnitude. This advancement provides a robust, transferable framework for optimizing massive pretraining corpora across both language and vision domains without relying on hidden oracle tuning.
GRASP: Geometry-aware Residual Alignment for Scalable Pretraining Data Attribution
arXiv:2606.06892v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Scalable data attribution methods typically assign isolated utility scores to individual training examples. This prevalent additive assumption fundamentally fails to capture critical subset dynamics, including data redundancy and complementary coverage. In this work, we reframe attribution as subset-level counterfactual utility prediction and introduce GRASP, an interaction-aware surrogate. Grounded in a theoretical smoothness lower bound, GRASP explicitly models subset interactions through a quadratic geometric penalty. To achieve pretraining-scale efficiency without relying on hidden oracle tuning, we couple low-dimensional feature sketches with a strictly finite lower-confidence bound selection protocol. Extensive subset-retraining evaluations demonstrate that GRASP decisively outperforms existing scalable baselines. It more than doubles the task-level rank correlation for counterfactual subset fidelity while reducing upfront artifact construction costs by nearly an order of magnitude. Downstream diagnostics further show that this scoring mechanism transfers to language model curation and cross-domain vision selection, establishing a robust foundation for optimizing massive pretraining corpora.
Abstract:Scalable data attribution methods typically assign isolated utility scores to individual training examples. This prevalent additive assumption fundamentally fails to capture critical subset dynamics, including data redundancy and complementary coverage. In this work, we reframe attribution as subset-level counterfactual utility prediction and introduce GRASP, an interaction-aware surrogate. Grounded in a theoretical smoothness lower bound, GRASP explicitly models subset interactions through a quadratic geometric penalty. To achieve pretraining-scale efficiency without relying on hidden oracle tuning, we couple low-dimensional feature sketches with a strictly finite lower-confidence bound selection protocol. Extensive subset-retraining evaluations demonstrate that GRASP decisively outperforms existing scalable baselines. It more than doubles the task-level rank correlation for counterfactual subset fidelity while reducing upfront artifact construction costs by nearly an order of magnitude. Downstream diagnostics further show that this scoring mechanism transfers to language model curation and cross-domain vision selection, establishing a robust foundation for optimizing massive pretraining corpora.
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2606.06892 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2606.06892v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.06892 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 242 words
Related coverage
GRASP: Geometry-aware Residual Alignment for Scalable Pretraining Data Attribution
arXiv · Sep 1, 2026

PIRAMID: Progress and Plans
LessWrong · Jul 27, 2026

Research Note: Filtering Subversion-Relevant Information From Pretraining Data Is Feasible
LessWrong · Oct 5, 2026
J++ Lens: Jacobian Filtering Enables More Faithful Workspace Lenses
LessWrong · Oct 8, 2026