Frozen in Time: How a Physics Foundation Model Forgets Under Sim-to-Real Adaptation

arXiv:2610.40857v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Scientific foundation models (SciFMs) have achieved remarkable performance on a wide range of PDEs, including the ability to efficiently adapt to unseen data distributions with additional finetuning. As with all neural architectures, finetuning such models comes with the risk of catastrophic forgetting, whereby adapting to new tasks degrades prior knowledge of the model. We study catastrophic forgetting in Walrus-1.3B, a SciFM for continuum dynamics, over the course of a two-stage sim-to-real adaptation: first finetuning on simulated flow around a cylinder and then adapting to experimental data of the same system. We find that finetuning on the simulations rapidly degrades rollout performance on the original pretraining datasets, with one-step errors increasing up to 35x after just 20 epochs. Subsequent adaptation to real data further erodes performance on the simulated task. We characterize the potential drivers of forgetting, such as dataset dependence and task representation similarity. We then show that replaying as little as 1% simulated data during real-data finetuning recovers most of the lost simulation performance while retaining effective adaptation to the experimental dynamics. Our results identify catastrophic forgetting as a practical obstacle to sim-to-real adaptation of SciFMs and show that lightweight replay strategies significantly improve retention.

Abstract:Scientific foundation models (SciFMs) have achieved remarkable performance on a wide range of PDEs, including the ability to efficiently adapt to unseen data distributions with additional finetuning. As with all neural architectures, finetuning such models comes with the risk of catastrophic forgetting, whereby adapting to new tasks degrades prior knowledge of the model. We study catastrophic forgetting in Walrus-1.3B, a SciFM for continuum dynamics, over the course of a two-stage sim-to-real adaptation: first finetuning on simulated flow around a cylinder and then adapting to experimental data of the same system. We find that finetuning on the simulations rapidly degrades rollout performance on the original pretraining datasets, with one-step errors increasing up to 35x after just 20 epochs. Subsequent adaptation to real data further erodes performance on the simulated task. We characterize the potential drivers of forgetting, such as dataset dependence and task representation similarity. We then show that replaying as little as 1% simulated data during real-data finetuning recovers most of the lost simulation performance while retaining effective adaptation to the experimental dynamics. Our results identify catastrophic forgetting as a practical obstacle to sim-to-real adaptation of SciFMs and show that lightweight replay strategies significantly improve retention.

Accepted at the Sim2Science workshop, NeurIPS 2026. Code: this https URL

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Fluid Dynamics (physics.flu-dyn)

arXiv:2610.40857 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2610.40857v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.40857 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

aiqbench analysis

Frozen in Time: How a Physics Foundation Model Forgets Under Sim-to-Real Adaptation

Related coverage