aiqbench analysis
This study demonstrates the efficacy of personalized fine-tuning on foundation ASR models like Whisper, significantly lowering word error rates for dysarthric speech with minimal adaptation data. While alternative approaches such as LoRA or switching to Qwen3-ASR yielded inferior results in this specific domain, the findings validate a practical pathway for deploying accessible communication tools using standard large-scale language model architectures.
Adapting Foundation ASR Models to Dysarthric Speech: A Case Study
arXiv:2606.31722v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems often perform poorly in dysarthric speech, limiting their usefulness to affected speakers in everyday communication. This paper presents a personalized ASR system for a dysarthric speaker, built by adapting a foundation ASR model to speaker-specific data. Using the TEQST tool, we collected 92 hours of read speech and later added 8.8 hours of user corrections gathered through a deployed mobile application. Starting from Whisper, fine-tuning reduced word error rate to 15.8% with only 1.4 hours of adaptation data on the read test set, reached 10.7% / 16.1% with 22.5 hours on the read and corrections test sets, respectively, and achieved the best result of 9.7% when using all available data including the corrections on the read test set and 7.8% on the corrections test set. Using LoRA adaptation and/or Qwen3-ASR as foundation model performed worse in this setting. The results show that personalized fine-tuning can make foundation ASR models substantially more effective for dysarthric speech and suitable for practical deployment.
Abstract:Automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems often perform poorly in dysarthric speech, limiting their usefulness to affected speakers in everyday communication. This paper presents a personalized ASR system for a dysarthric speaker, built by adapting a foundation ASR model to speaker-specific data. Using the TEQST tool, we collected 92 hours of read speech and later added 8.8 hours of user corrections gathered through a deployed mobile application. Starting from Whisper, fine-tuning reduced word error rate to 15.8% with only 1.4 hours of adaptation data on the read test set, reached 10.7% / 16.1% with 22.5 hours on the read and corrections test sets, respectively, and achieved the best result of 9.7% when using all available data including the corrections on the read test set and 7.8% on the corrections test set. Using LoRA adaptation and/or Qwen3-ASR as foundation model performed worse in this setting. The results show that personalized fine-tuning can make foundation ASR models substantially more effective for dysarthric speech and suitable for practical deployment.
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2606.31722 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2606.31722v2 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.31722 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 258 words
Related coverage

Introducing the Third Generation of Apple’s Foundation Models
Apple · Jun 8, 2026
The J-Space Debate, Agent Swarms, and Pacing Frontier AI - Digital Minds Newsletter #4
LessWrong · Sep 18, 2026

Six Principles of Voice Design: Designing for the Ear and Encoding It into Agent Script
Salesforce Blog · Oct 8, 2026

NVIDIA GTC Taipei at COMPUTEX: Live Updates on What’s Next in AI
NVIDIA · May 21, 2026