aiqbench analysis
This survey categorizes video-to-control methods for robotic manipulation into three families: direct policies, latent-action intermediates, and explicit visual interfaces. The analysis highlights that the most critical open challenge lies in the robotics integration layer, which must bridge video-derived predictions with dependable physical execution. Researchers should prioritize closing this gap to ensure reliable control loops that account for embodiment and physical constraints.
From Video to Control: A Survey of Learning Manipulation Interfaces from Temporal Visual Data
arXiv:2604.04974v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Video is a scalable observation of physical dynamics: it captures how objects move, how contact unfolds, and how scenes evolve under interaction -- all without requiring robot action labels. Yet translating this temporal structure into reliable robotic control remains an open challenge, because video lacks action supervision and differs from robot experience in embodiment, viewpoint, and physical constraints. This survey reviews methods that exploit non-action-annotated temporal video to learn control interfaces for robotic manipulation. We introduce an interface-centric taxonomy organized by where the video-to-control interface is constructed and what control properties it enables, identifying three families: direct video-action policies, which keep the interface implicit; latent-action methods, which route temporal structure through a compact learned intermediate; and explicit visual interfaces, which predict interpretable targets for downstream control. For each family, we analyze control-integration properties -- how the loop is closed, what can be verified before execution, and where failures enter. A cross-family synthesis reveals that the most pressing open challenges center on the robotics integration layer -- the mechanisms that connect video-derived predictions to dependable robot behavior -- and we outline research directions toward closing this gap.
Abstract:Video is a scalable observation of physical dynamics: it captures how objects move, how contact unfolds, and how scenes evolve under interaction -- all without requiring robot action labels. Yet translating this temporal structure into reliable robotic control remains an open challenge, because video lacks action supervision and differs from robot experience in embodiment, viewpoint, and physical constraints. This survey reviews methods that exploit non-action-annotated temporal video to learn control interfaces for robotic manipulation. We introduce an interface-centric taxonomy organized by where the video-to-control interface is constructed and what control properties it enables, identifying three families: direct video-action policies, which keep the interface implicit; latent-action methods, which route temporal structure through a compact learned intermediate; and explicit visual interfaces, which predict interpretable targets for downstream control. For each family, we analyze control-integration properties -- how the loop is closed, what can be verified before execution, and where failures enter. A cross-family synthesis reveals that the most pressing open challenges center on the robotics integration layer -- the mechanisms that connect video-derived predictions to dependable robot behavior -- and we outline research directions toward closing this gap.
Robotics (cs.RO)
arXiv:2604.04974 [cs.RO]
(or arXiv:2604.04974v3 [cs.RO] for this version)
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 196 words
Related coverage
From Video to Control: A Survey of Learning Manipulation Interfaces from Temporal Visual Data
arXiv · Jun 3, 2026

Runway’s WorldPrompt and the Engineering of Real-Time Worlds
Latent Space · Sep 25, 2026
World-Action Models for Robot Learning and Control: A Survey
arXiv · Sep 16, 2026

Building a Foundation Stack for General-Purpose Robots
IEEE Spectrum · Jul 13, 2026