Sari la conținut

Română · beta. Traducerea a fost făcută automat și este încă în curs de revizuire. Citește pagina în engleză

perspectiva aiqbenchCercetare AI

analiza aiqbench

This survey categorizes video-to-control methods for robotic manipulation into three families: direct policies, latent-action intermediates, and explicit visual interfaces. The analysis highlights that the most critical open challenge lies in the robotics integration layer, which must bridge video-derived predictions with dependable physical execution. Researchers should prioritize closing this gap to ensure reliable control loops that account for embodiment and physical constraints.
Surse care acoperăarXiv, LessWrong, Quantum Computing Report, Fortune
Ce este aceastaLectura unui model asupra articolului și a acoperirii conexe, scrisă pentru aiqbench. Nu sunt cuvintele publicației.

From Video to Control: A Survey of Learning Manipulation Interfaces from Temporal Visual Data

arXiv2 min de cititArticolul și perspectiva sunt în engleză.

arXiv:2604.04974v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Video is a scalable observation of physical dynamics: it captures how objects move, how contact unfolds, and how scenes evolve under interaction -- all without requiring robot action labels. Yet translating this temporal structure into reliable robotic control remains an open challenge, because video lacks action supervision and differs from robot experience in embodiment, viewpoint, and physical constraints. This survey reviews methods that exploit non-action-annotated temporal video to learn control interfaces for robotic manipulation. We introduce an interface-centric taxonomy organized by where the video-to-control interface is constructed and what control properties it enables, identifying three families: direct video-action policies, which keep the interface implicit; latent-action methods, which route temporal structure through a compact learned intermediate; and explicit visual interfaces, which predict interpretable targets for downstream control. For each family, we analyze control-integration properties -- how the loop is closed, what can be verified before execution, and where failures enter. A cross-family synthesis reveals that the most pressing open challenges center on the robotics integration layer -- the mechanisms that connect video-derived predictions to dependable robot behavior -- and we outline research directions toward closing this gap.

Abstract:Video is a scalable observation of physical dynamics: it captures how objects move, how contact unfolds, and how scenes evolve under interaction -- all without requiring robot action labels. Yet translating this temporal structure into reliable robotic control remains an open challenge, because video lacks action supervision and differs from robot experience in embodiment, viewpoint, and physical constraints. This survey reviews methods that exploit non-action-annotated temporal video to learn control interfaces for robotic manipulation. We introduce an interface-centric taxonomy organized by where the video-to-control interface is constructed and what control properties it enables, identifying three families: direct video-action policies, which keep the interface implicit; latent-action methods, which route temporal structure through a compact learned intermediate; and explicit visual interfaces, which predict interpretable targets for downstream control. For each family, we analyze control-integration properties -- how the loop is closed, what can be verified before execution, and where failures enter. A cross-family synthesis reveals that the most pressing open challenges center on the robotics integration layer -- the mechanisms that connect video-derived predictions to dependable robot behavior -- and we outline research directions toward closing this gap.

Robotics (cs.RO)

arXiv:2604.04974 [cs.RO]

(or arXiv:2604.04974v3 [cs.RO] for this version)

Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 196 cuvinte

Subiecte conexe